FTC v. Meta: the antitrust battle over Instagram and WhatsApp
See all Stories
L
WhatsApp could have made enough money without ads.
Acton testifies that the startup had already broken even on the roughly $8 million it raised and had only begun charging its $1 per year subscription in seven countries, meaning there was plenty of room to grow. As its pricing power grew, he theorizes, WhatsApp could have eventually bumped the price to $5 or $10 per year. While the FTC has theorized that WhatsApp likely would have had to run ads eventually to satisfy investors — with or without Meta — Meta says the founders had no interest or need to shift to an ad model without the acquisition.
Follow topics and authors from this story to see more like this in your personalized homepage feed and to receive email updates.
Loading comments
Getting the conversation ready...
Most Popular
Most Popular
- Our long national sunscreen nightmare is almost over
- Kaleidescape’s movie player blows streaming, and your wallet, away
- Barret Zoph is out at OpenAI again after just five months
- Midjourney goes from generating cat images to full-body ultrasound scans
- Hue’s wired wall modules bring non-smart lights into its ecosystem











