The Supreme Court hears arguments for two cases that could reshape the future of the internet
See all Stories
Sotomayor:
“There is a focus on how much your platform helped ISIS, and less on how you actually helped them, and there is a difference between the two things. … [Your argument is that] in a neutral business setting, using something that is otherwise not criminal, a platform, to communicate with people, and you’re doing it not by as in the bank situation or pharmaceutical situation, to help this particular person to commit a crime, but in a general business situation that others are coming to you and you can’t find them ahead of time, that that doesn’t constitute substantiality.”
Most Popular
- Midjourney goes from generating cat images to full-body ultrasound scans
- This robotic self-driving toilet comes to you
- Apple’s weird anti-nausea dots cured my car sickness
- Amazon employees say they’re facing termination for backing data center limits
- Barret Zoph is out at OpenAI again after just five months











