US v. Google: all the news from the search antitrust showdown
See all Stories
A
Google’s attorney cites a “laundry list” of reasons selling Chrome (and maybe Android) is bad.
Schmidtlein says not only is it not justified by the law, the tangible harms outweigh “speculative benefits” to the competitive landscape. There’s “voluminous evidence” Chrome succeeded through innovation.
Mehta says the outcome of this plan is “less speculative” than many of the other proposals, and “in some sense, it’s from a judicial standpoint, a little cleaner and a little more elegant and a little less speculative than some of the other remedies.”
Follow topics and authors from this story to see more like this in your personalized homepage feed and to receive email updates.
Loading comments
Getting the conversation ready...
Most Popular
Most Popular
- Our long national sunscreen nightmare is almost over
- Kaleidescape’s movie player blows streaming, and your wallet, away
- Barret Zoph is out at OpenAI again after just five months
- Midjourney goes from generating cat images to full-body ultrasound scans
- Hue’s wired wall modules bring non-smart lights into its ecosystem
