Supreme Court hears arguments on the future of online speech: all the news
See all Stories
A
Clarence Thomas is mad at Section 230 again.
After reminding us he’s older than the internet, Thomas makes the claim that sites have been claiming Section 230 protections as neutral “conduits,” accusing them of hypocrisy for saying they hold editorial standards now. NetChoice’s Clement disagrees — saying they’re simply not supposed to be treated as the publishers of specific user-generated content.
Follow topics and authors from this story to see more like this in your personalized homepage feed and to receive email updates.
Loading comments
Getting the conversation ready...
Most Popular
Most Popular
- Meta’s historic loss in court could cost a lot more than $375 million
- Apple raises the Mac Mini’s starting price
- How the internet’s favorite squirrel dad made the hottest camera app of 2026
- These reusable digital Polaroids are a clever way to cover a fridge in memories
- AI music is flooding streaming services — but who wants it?
