Epic v. Google: everything we learned in Fortnite court
See all Stories
By positioning the whole web of relationships as a simple matter of buyers (Android app users, Android developers, OEMs) and sellers (Google), Bernheim says Apple isn’t a factor, because Apple doesn’t directly participate in those particular markets — and would still be positioned to take advantage of those buyers even if other markets exist.
“Is there anything wrong with saying... that’s one big market that competes with Apple?” asks Epic’s lead attorney.
“There would be quite a bit wrong with that,” says Bernheim.
“We’re looking to see whether there are pockets of transactions where sellers can take advantage of buyers,” he says, saying it’s part of a framework antitrust economists use to do competition analysis — and there’s a general consensus you do it that way.
I expect Google’s economist will say there’s no such consensus.
Most Popular
- Apple’s weird anti-nausea dots cured my car sickness
- Apple’s smart home camera service is starting to impress me
- Tim Cook says RAM expenses are ‘unsustainable’ and Apple is going to raise prices
- The Google / Xreal Aura XR glasses are now available to preorder
- Snap is finally about to ship AR glasses — and they cost a fortune
