Epic v. Google: everything we learned in Fortnite court
See all Stories
We’ve touched on market definition before, and it’s the key to each side’s case.
“I’ve concluded that Google has monopoly power in the market of app distribution on Android smartphones,” says Epic’s economics expert Doug Bernheim, adding that Google “engages in anticompetitive conduct” to maintain its monopoly there.
He says he was assigned to:
1) Determine whether Google’s challenged conduct obstructs competition
2) Identify the relevant antitrust markets for purposes of evaluating Google’s market power
3) Determine whether Google possesses monopoly power
4) Determine whether Google’s challenged conduct harms consumers and developers
Now, he’s explaining what concepts as simple as “competition” and “monopoly power” mean. I’ll let you know when we move further — he says he’ll get specific.
Most Popular
- Apple’s weird anti-nausea dots cured my car sickness
- Midjourney goes from generating cat images to full-body ultrasound scans
- Tim Cook says RAM expenses are ‘unsustainable’ and Apple is going to raise prices
- Apple’s smart home camera service is starting to impress me
- Can anyone look cool wearing Snap’s $2,000 glasses?
