<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><feed
	xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0"
	xml:lang="en-US"
	>
	<title type="text">Lauren Feiner | The Verge</title>
	<subtitle type="text">The Verge is about technology and how it makes us feel. Founded in 2011, we offer our audience everything from breaking news to reviews to award-winning features and investigations, on our site, in video, and in podcasts.</subtitle>

	<updated>2026-09-15T20:13:30+00:00</updated>

	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.theverge.com/author/lauren-feiner" />
	<id>https://www.theverge.com/authors/lauren-feiner/rss</id>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.theverge.com/authors/lauren-feiner/rss" />

	<icon>https://platform.theverge.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2025/01/verge-rss-large_80b47e.png?w=150&amp;h=150&amp;crop=1</icon>
		<entry>
			
			<author>
				<name>Lauren Feiner</name>
			</author>
			
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[What if social media isn’t hurting kids?]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.theverge.com/policy/995704/peter-gray-restoring-childhood-jonathan-haidt" />
			<id>https://www.theverge.com/?p=995704</id>
			<updated>2026-09-15T16:13:30-04:00</updated>
			<published>2026-09-15T16:13:30-04:00</published>
			<category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Podcasts" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Policy" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Report" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Social Media" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Tech" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Vergecast" />
							<summary type="html"><![CDATA[Two years ago, social psychologist Jonathan Haidt released his New York Times bestseller The Anxious Generation. The book posits that the rise of social media and smartphone use is largely to blame for the prominent decline in teen mental health since 2010. It quickly became a central rallying cry of the social media backlash. Haidt [&#8230;]]]></summary>
			
							<content type="html">
											<![CDATA[

						
<figure>

<img alt="Child using social media on a cell phone on a graphic green background." data-caption="" data-portal-copyright="Image: Cath Virginia / The Verge, Getty Images" data-has-syndication-rights="1" src="https://platform.theverge.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2026/02/STKS526_SOCIAL_MEDIA_TRIAL_CVIRGINIA_C.jpg?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" />
	<figcaption>
		</figcaption>
</figure>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Two years ago, social psychologist Jonathan Haidt released his <em>New York Times</em> bestseller <em>The Anxious Generation.</em> The book posits that the rise of social media and smartphone use is largely to blame for the prominent decline in teen mental health since 2010. It quickly became a central rallying cry of the social media backlash. Haidt has been <a href="https://www.cnn.com/2025/12/10/australia/australia-social-media-anxiety-intl-hnk">credited with helping inspire</a> Australia’s nationwide teen social media ban. He has joined forces with <a href="https://www.theverge.com/policy/893930/social-media-addiction-trial-los-angeles-zuckerberg-instagram-youtube">bereaved parents who are fighting tech companies in court</a>. His name comes up unprompted in conversations with people in power who say his book opened their eyes to an online crisis.&nbsp;</p>

<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Haidt’s theory has received regular critiques from recognized academics. Candice Odgers, a leading <a href="https://candiceodgers.com/">adolescent mental health researcher</a>, wrote a <a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-024-00902-2">scathing review of Haidt’s analysis</a> in <em>Nature</em> that opened by conceding, “this book is going to sell a lot of copies, because Jonathan Haidt is telling a scary story about children’s development that many parents are primed to believe.” Now, in the wake of that highly accurate prediction, a former colleague of Haidt’s seeks to not only take down his theory, but also offer an alternative. The biggest question may not be whether he’s correct — but whether it’s too late to change course if he is.</p>
<div class="youtube-embed"><iframe title="Is social media driving teen mental health issues? | The Vergecast" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/iWiaMVIHTLc?rel=0" allowfullscreen allow="accelerometer *; clipboard-write *; encrypted-media *; gyroscope *; picture-in-picture *; web-share *;"></iframe></div>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In his new book <em>Restoring Childhood</em>, psychology researcher Peter Gray argues that teens’ mental health declined thanks to decades of steadily reduced autonomy, and after a brief period of reprieve, fell again in the 2010s not —&nbsp;as Haidt argues — because of phones and social media, but because of rigid schooling methods linked to the Common Core curriculum <a href="https://www.edweek.org/policy-politics/no-child-left-behind-an-overview/2015/04">and government pressure to improve children’s performance</a>. And far from being damaging, Gray also argues the adoption of home internet in the 1990s and 2000s actually drove a rebound in teens’ mental health by restoring freedom and connection lost in earlier decades. He fears social media bans aren’t just —&nbsp;as Odgers has argued —&nbsp;a distraction from real solutions, but a new harm in themselves.</p>

<figure class="wp-block-pullquote"><blockquote><p>“You take a smartphone away from your kids and that study suggests you&#8217;ll make them less happy”</p></blockquote></figure>

<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In an interview on <em>The Vergecast</em>, Gray told me that Haidt’s book “completely ignored” dozens of meta-analyses and other research that’s found “not even a meaningful correlation between the amount of time kids are on social media or on smartphones and their mental health.” Where there is some connection, Gray adds, studies suggest that teens may use social media to <em>cope</em> with their depression or anxiety. He <a href="https://www.stpetersburg.usf.edu/news/2025/results-from-usf-study-on-kids-digital-media-use-reveal-benefits-of-smartphones.aspx">references a study in Florida</a> that found 11-to-13-year-olds who owned smartphones were more likely to spend real-world time with friends. “You take a smartphone away from your kids and that study suggests you&#8217;ll make them less happy and they&#8217;ll have less friends,” he says.</p>

<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Gray says that in studies through the years, kids consistently identify school pressure, not social media, as their top source of anxiety. “That doesn&#8217;t mean it&#8217;s the primary source for everybody, but when you&#8217;re looking at the population at large, every single study that I&#8217;ve been able to find where kids are asked, ‘What&#8217;s the primary source of your anxiety or your stress or your depression?’, in every single one of them, school pressure comes out on top,” Gray tells me. “Nothing else comes close.”</p>

<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Gray and Haidt both believe that since at least the 1980s, increased restrictions on kids’ independence and unstructured play have damaged their resilience. While it used to be common for kids to play together unsupervised, that practice has diminished in part due to the rise of “stranger danger” narratives fostered by rare, but high-profile, crimes. In 2017 the pair helped cofound an organization called Let Grow, which advocates for policies that make it easier for parents to let their children play freely, like ensuring they can’t be considered neglectful for letting kids outside by themselves. But the two have split sharply over the impact of the internet. Gray’s book is intended as a deliberate rebuttal to Haidt’s — after <em>The Anxious Generation</em>’s release, Gray resigned from the board of Let Grow to avoid conflict within the organization.&nbsp;</p>

<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Haidt did not respond to a request for comment from <em>The Verge</em>, but he told <em>The Atlantic</em>’s<em> </em>Kaitlyn Tiffany in a <a href="https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/2026/07/phones-haidt-play-gray/687846/">July article</a> that the 1990s and early 2000s dip in teen suicide rates may be credited to a phase-out of leaded gasoline, since lead exposure has been linked to mental health issues. He also told Tiffany that Gray relied too heavily on a minority dissenting group of researchers. Tiffany writes that many of the more than a dozen tech and child development researchers she spoke to “expressed concern that Haidt overstates the strength of correlational findings and suggests causation where it hasn’t been proved.”</p>

<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Gray accuses Haidt of stirring a moral panic over technology that isn’t, on the whole, harmful. Looking across research, he says, Common Core is the clearest explanation for the sudden decline in teen mental health. And at the population level, the impact of social media “balances out. Some kids are doing better, some kids are doing worse because they&#8217;re on social media.”</p>

<figure class="wp-block-pullquote"><blockquote><p>“We need to stop treating kids as if they&#8217;re idiots”</p></blockquote></figure>

<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Gray says he’s not opposed to all guardrails, including school phone bans and the concept of age verification for accessing pornography. But he questions the effectiveness of bans on social media, knowing kids are likely to get around them, and is hesitant to restrict platforms that let kids express themselves —&nbsp;suggesting instead that parents focus on teaching their children to navigate them. “We need to stop treating kids as if they&#8217;re idiots,” he told me. “We need to start understanding that kids are pretty good at knowing what&#8217;s good for them and not good for them and they can benefit from our help in learning how to do these things.”</p>

<p class="wp-block-paragraph">But increasingly, parents of younger teens may not have that choice. Haidt’s theory holds undisputed dominance in many circles, including among politicians. Since Australia’s social media ban for teens, <a href="https://www.theverge.com/policy/949679/uk-under-16-social-media-ban-announcement">the UK</a> and <a href="https://www.theverge.com/tech/964565/eu-children-social-media-online-safety-rules">European Union</a> are among those considering their own bans or platform limits. In the US, states like <a href="https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/tech-news/california-enacts-new-curbs-social-media-children-rcna597179">California</a> and <a href="https://www.theverge.com/policy/972007/new-york-safe-for-kids-act-age-verification">New York</a> have enacted limits on certain social media features, and a <a href="https://www.schatz.senate.gov/kosma">federal proposal</a> would restrict algorithmic feeds for kids under 17. Even among people who find Gray’s arguments about Common Core convincing, some might still see taking kids offline as a harmless precaution.</p>

<p class="wp-block-paragraph">With so much momentum behind the backlash against phones and social media, can Gray’s book still make a difference? “I certainly hope it’s not too late,” he says. He points out that some moral panics have petered out. In the 1990s and 2000s, for instance, many people worried that video games like <em>Mortal Kombat</em> and <em>Doom</em> were making kids more violent, connecting their rise to that of school shootings. Eventually, <a href="https://www.cbsnews.com/news/80-percent-of-mass-shooters-showed-no-interest-in-video-games-researcher-says/">research showed many mass shooters didn’t play video games</a> after all. Attempts at regulation —&nbsp;including <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brown_v._Entertainment_Merchants_Association">a California ban</a> on the sale of violent games to children — were largely overruled. And many kids who did play them grew up to become those in charge. “The science won out eventually,” Gray says. “So it&#8217;s not me that&#8217;s going to win out. It&#8217;s the science that&#8217;s going to win out.”</p>
						]]>
									</content>
			
					</entry>
			<entry>
			
			<author>
				<name>Lauren Feiner</name>
			</author>
			
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Schools are catching on to Big Tech’s playbook]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.theverge.com/policy/993308/computer-science-ai-education-coding-kids" />
			<id>https://www.theverge.com/?p=993308</id>
			<updated>2026-09-10T15:49:38-04:00</updated>
			<published>2026-09-10T15:44:20-04:00</published>
			<category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="AI" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Podcasts" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Policy" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Report" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Vergecast" />
							<summary type="html"><![CDATA[It’s the hot new thing in tech, and it’s where all the jobs are. Students who don’t learn to use it fall behind. And to help them catch up in time, its creators are graciously providing the resources and curriculum for learning it, often pro bono. That’s the narrative AI companies are pitching schools on [&#8230;]]]></summary>
			
							<content type="html">
											<![CDATA[

						
<figure>

<img alt="laptop with an apple on a stack of books" data-caption="" data-portal-copyright="Image: The Verge" data-has-syndication-rights="1" src="https://platform.theverge.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2025/09/STK483_EDUCATION_D.jpg?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" />
	<figcaption>
		</figcaption>
</figure>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">It’s the hot new thing in tech, and it’s where all the jobs are. Students who don’t learn to use it fall behind. And to help them catch up in time, its creators are graciously providing the resources and curriculum for learning it, often pro bono.</p>

<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That’s the narrative AI companies are pitching schools on right now, but according to <em>New York Times</em> education technology reporter Natasha Singer, it’s also how the tech industry has built its influence in classrooms for the past 15 years.</p>

<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In a new book, <em>Coding Kids</em>,<em> </em>Singer details how tech companies took a central role in promoting computers and coding skills in education, promising computer science skills were the ticket to high-paying jobs. But by the time many of those students entered the workforce, new technologies had thrown that promise into question. Meanwhile, the companies got schools to help them create a new class of would-be workers, and trained students on using their products and software, making them likely future customers.</p>

<figure class="wp-block-pullquote"><blockquote><p>“I worry we have collective amnesia”</p></blockquote></figure>

<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Now, the AI industry is pitching itself to schools with similar force. “I worry we have collective amnesia,” Singer told me on a recent episode of <em>The Vergecast.</em> “Have we learned any lessons from these past tech cycles in schools that are going to inform the rollout of AI, make sure that it benefits education, and put in the safeguards now — not a decade from now?” Fortunately, in some ways, she believes the answer is yes.</p>

<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Singer’s book recounts how more than a decade ago, the country’s largest tech companies embedded themselves directly into school curricula through courses for Advanced Placement Computer Science Principles classes. Apple and Microsoft each created their own curricula, featuring their own tools like Apple’s Swift or Microsoft’s <em>Minecraft.</em> “What&#8217;s striking about this is you can imagine that parents would not want, say, Pfizer AP Biology, or Northrop Grumman AP Physics, or ExxonMobil Environmental Science AP,” Singer says. She found that those in the medical field would likely understand why — medical students who are trained by a company on how to implant their proprietary device, one expert told her as an example, rarely choose to try another.</p>

<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Google has also made itself a dominant force in education through its distribution of low-cost laptops called Chromebooks. Singer tracked their ubiquitous adoption across schools through the 2010s, which she says was accelerated even further during the school shutdowns of the covid-19 pandemic. Google also introduced its Classroom app to help teachers communicate things like assignments and grades. By the time generative AI took off, Singer writes, Google was already a key platform provider for many schools, and well-positioned to promote it.</p>
<div class="youtube-embed"><iframe title="Schools are catching onto tech’s playbook" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/jjww1yqk7hw?rel=0" allowfullscreen allow="accelerometer *; clipboard-write *; encrypted-media *; gyroscope *; picture-in-picture *; web-share *;"></iframe></div>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Even when companies weren’t directly involved in education, they backed nonprofit groups like Code.org. <a href="http://code.org">Code.org</a> kicked off its viral education campaign with a splashy celebrity-laden video that included tech moguls like Microsoft founder Bill Gates and then-Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg, urging kids to learn to code. <a href="http://code.org">Code.org</a> founder Hadi Partovi took a startup-style approach to promoting computer science education, and had little planned for how to capitalize on the attention of the video once it took off, Singer writes. He ultimately funneled that attention into a similarly splashy “Hour of Code” campaign across the country, urging schools to engage in entertaining hour-long courses introducing kids to coding building blocks.</p>

<p class="wp-block-paragraph">At the time, there wasn’t much pushback, Singer found —&nbsp;though there were some attempts at alternatives. One group of academics engaged in a more traditional, methodological approach to testing and rolling out their own computer science curriculum. It had the express goal of diversifying the kinds of students enrolled in such courses, and taught students to think about big questions around the internet and technology, and scrutinize builders’ motivations.&nbsp;&nbsp;</p>

<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Eventually, backlash arrived. Some recent graduates say they feel let down that they were told to code their whole lives, just to find such entry-level jobs to be diminishing, Singer told me. Some schools are <a href="https://www.edweek.org/technology/why-this-district-is-getting-rid-of-chromebooks-for-k-2-students/2026/08">getting rid of ubiquitous Google Chromebooks</a>, and <a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0272775719302729#abstracts">research</a> <a href="https://www.nber.org/papers/w34495">around</a> the world is finding that adding technology to the classroom often <a href="https://gem-report-2023.unesco.org/">doesn’t have a significant impact</a> on actual learning.</p>

<figure class="wp-block-pullquote"><blockquote><p>“Most parents want more than just getting kids to learn to use tech”</p></blockquote></figure>

<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“I&#8217;m not arguing against tech education or tech in schools,” Singer says. “But what I am saying is most parents want more than just getting kids to learn to use tech. They want kids to learn how to be informed citizens in a democracy, and they want kids to figure out what their passions are and who they are and what their beliefs are… And so if we let the tech industry dictate or even heavily influence what happens in schools, then the question we&#8217;re asking is, how can we get AI into schools faster? Which is a product question, and not, ‘What are the most important things we want kids to learn?’”</p>

<p class="wp-block-paragraph">While the AI industry of the 2020s may be pulling from the 2010s playbook, there already appears to be one distinct difference: Parents and school districts are pushing back. Just last week, the nation’s largest school system, New York City, <a href="https://www.theverge.com/policy/988228/nyc-ai-restrictions-in-schools-chatbot-ban">banned elementary and middle schools</a> from letting students use AI in the classroom for the coming school year. A day later, Los Angeles announced an even broader restriction that included high schoolers. And unlike the few-and-far-between critiques Singer documented in the early days of tech’s coding push, there appears to be a <a href="https://www.nbcnews.com/news/education/parent-activists-pushed-schools-ai-screen-time-won-rcna595683">vibrant grassroots movement</a> fighting the screen- and AI-ification of the classroom among parents and teachers alike.</p>

<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“I think schools are beginning to figure it out,” says Singer, who’s “optimistic” that teachers and students are looking for a broader kind of tech education. That curriculum could teach kids “to ask deep questions about how companies are steering us with their technology, how software and AI are designed to affect our choices, and what role students have to use the tools productively. But also to push back if they like, and to not feel like they&#8217;re in a world where AI is driving them.”</p>
						]]>
									</content>
			
					</entry>
			<entry>
			
			<author>
				<name>Lauren Feiner</name>
			</author>
			
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Microsoft has new AI privacy rules for schools]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.theverge.com/policy/992359/microsoft-aft-schools-ai-privacy" />
			<id>https://www.theverge.com/?p=992359</id>
			<updated>2026-09-09T13:07:48-04:00</updated>
			<published>2026-09-09T13:07:48-04:00</published>
			<category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="AI" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Microsoft" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Policy" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Tech" />
							<summary type="html"><![CDATA[Microsoft agreed to a set of safety and privacy principles for AI in schools a week after two major school systems announced a ban on student-facing AI.&#160; In a new agreement with the American Federation of Teachers (AFT), the second-largest teachers union in the US, and its New York City affiliate the United Federation of [&#8230;]]]></summary>
			
							<content type="html">
											<![CDATA[

						
<figure>

<img alt="Photo illustration of pixels coming out of a locker." data-caption="" data-portal-copyright="Cath Virginia / The Verge | Photos from Getty Images" data-has-syndication-rights="1" src="https://platform.theverge.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/25332715/STK419_DEEPFAKE_CVIRGINIA_J.jpg?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" />
	<figcaption>
		</figcaption>
</figure>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Microsoft <a href="https://news.microsoft.com/source/2026/09/09/aft-uft-and-microsoft-announce-national-ai-safety-privacy-standard-for-schools-to-protect-students-families-and-educators/">agreed to a set of safety and privacy principles</a> for AI in schools a week after two major school systems announced a ban on student-facing AI.&nbsp;</p>

<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In a new agreement with the American Federation of Teachers (AFT), the second-largest teachers union in the US, and its New York City affiliate the United Federation of Teachers (UFT), Microsoft committed to ten principles that can be contractually enforced by school districts that adopt them. The terms include pledging not to train AI models on student or educator data, limiting the amount of data Microsoft collects in the first place and disclosing to families how its tools work in plain language, prohibiting AI companions, and requiring human review for “high-risk” decisions.</p>

<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The agreement comes after <a href="https://www.theverge.com/policy/989735/los-angeles-is-the-next-major-school-district-to-ban-ai-for-students">New York City</a> and <a href="https://www.theverge.com/policy/989735/los-angeles-is-the-next-major-school-district-to-ban-ai-for-students">Los Angeles </a>both implemented one-year bans on AI tools for many students, giving the districts time to consider the proper use and guardrails. As parents and some educators have resisted the use of AI and screens more generally in schools, Microsoft likely recognizes that similar decisions could be coming. Beginning in November, school districts can opt to add the terms to new or existing agreements without having to renegotiate their entire contracts.&nbsp;</p>

<figure class="wp-block-pullquote"><blockquote><p>“[N]o one else, including the federal government, has stepped up to do the real work”</p></blockquote></figure>

<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The AFT, for its part, has been critical of tech in schools, but also open to working with tech companies to prepare for the current AI wave. In a <a href="https://www.aft.org/press-release/devices-down-eyes-hands-weingarten-calls-screen-bans-ai-limits-active-learning-major">May speech</a>, AFT President Randi Weingarten called for a ban on screens before third grade as well as “student-facing AI” before middle school. But the group also announced a <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2025/07/08/technology/chatgpt-teachers-openai-microsoft.html">$23 million AI training hub</a> for educators funded by Anthropic, Microsoft, and OpenAI.</p>

<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In a statement about the new privacy agreement with Microsoft, Weingarten said the terms were “iron-clad” and necessary “because no one else, including the federal government, has stepped up to do the real work.” She added, “We can get angrier and angrier, or we can act decisively; anything less than legally enforceable provisions is simply a wish list.”</p>
						]]>
									</content>
			
					</entry>
			<entry>
			
			<author>
				<name>Lauren Feiner</name>
			</author>
			
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Microsoft says virtually nobody was grabbing NYT articles through its chatbot]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.theverge.com/policy/990267/microsoft-openai-new-york-times-authors-lawsuit" />
			<id>https://www.theverge.com/?p=990267</id>
			<updated>2026-09-04T13:10:35-04:00</updated>
			<published>2026-09-04T12:05:57-04:00</published>
			<category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="AI" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Copyright" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Law" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Microsoft" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="OpenAI" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Policy" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Tech" />
							<summary type="html"><![CDATA[Microsoft’s Copilot rarely reproduces even full sentences from news articles and books, let alone substantive chunks that could substitute for the original, the company says in new legal filings as it fights copyright claims from publishers including The New York Times and book authors. As part of the lawsuit’s discovery, Microsoft provided 8.2 million Copilot [&#8230;]]]></summary>
			
							<content type="html">
											<![CDATA[

						
<figure>

<img alt="An illustration of the Copilot logo" data-caption="" data-portal-copyright="Image: The Verge" data-has-syndication-rights="1" src="https://platform.theverge.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2025/08/STK259_MICROSOFT_COPILOT_2__B.png?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" />
	<figcaption>
		</figcaption>
</figure>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Microsoft’s Copilot rarely reproduces even full sentences from news articles and books, let alone substantive chunks that could substitute for the original, the company says in new legal filings as it fights copyright claims from <a href="https://www.theverge.com/2023/12/27/24016212/new-york-times-openai-microsoft-lawsuit-copyright-infringement">publishers including <em>The New York Times</em></a> and <a href="https://www.theverge.com/news/693516/authors-throw-the-book-at-microsoft-ai">book authors</a>.</p>

<p class="wp-block-paragraph">As part of the lawsuit’s discovery, Microsoft provided 8.2 million Copilot chat logs to an expert hired by news publishers. The logs, it claims, were specifically chosen “because they hit on keywords implicating use of News Plaintiffs’ websites, and therefore the most likely to contain News Plaintiffs’ works.” It says the resulting analysis shows that 59,545 of these contained at least 16 words in common with news content used to ground the AI model. An expert for the Center for Investigative Reporting found 51 instances of “substantial overlap” with CIR work in the dataset, Microsoft says. Similarly, an expert in the authors’ suit found that the 8.2 million conversations with Copilot only had 24 responses that contained at least 30 matching words. Only 10 of the 212 books evaluated had any matches, <a href="https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/67810584/1211/authors-guild-v-openai-inc/">Microsoft claims</a>. </p>

<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The<em> Times</em> disagreed with Microsoft’s conclusions. “The<em> </em>documents and testimony uncovered during discovery lead to only one conclusion: Microsoft and OpenAI stole from The New York Times to make commercial products that substitute for its journalism, threaten its business, and undermine its industry,” the <em>Times</em>’ lead counsel Ian Crosby said in a statement. “We look forward to Microsoft and OpenAI being held accountable for their theft.” CIR, and Authors Guild did not immediately respond to requests for comment.</p>

<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Microsoft argues that the numbers bolster its case that using copyrighted content for AI training datasets should be considered fair use. While systems like Copilot rely on using copyrighted material, it says, the resulting systems are used for significantly different purposes than the original. The fact that they sometimes reproduce sections of text, it concludes, “hardly undermines the transformative purpose of LLM training.”</p>

<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The filings were made as part of a legal battle brought by publishers and authors against Microsoft and OpenAI, which the plaintiffs claim built products on their works and now compete with them directly, in part by regurgitating copyrighted content. The news publishers’ and books authors’ claims were <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/books/2025/apr/04/us-authors-copyright-lawsuits-against-openai-and-microsoft-combined-in-new-york-with-newspaper-actions">consolidated under one judge</a> to streamline the process, despite objections from the publishers and authors. Microsoft submitted its filing on Friday as it argues for the judge to issue a summary judgement, which would end the case at an early stage. (The Trump administration also <a href="https://www.theverge.com/ai-artificial-intelligence/988344/trump-administration-new-york-times-openai-lawsuit">filed a statement of interest</a> in the <em>New York Times</em> case this week, supporting OpenAI.) If the judge sides with the publishers and authors, the legal battle will continue in court.</p>
						]]>
									</content>
			
					</entry>
			<entry>
			
			<author>
				<name>Lauren Feiner</name>
			</author>
			
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Congressman says TikTok backed out of a meeting to avoid child safety questions]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.theverge.com/policy/989769/tiktok-house-committee-china-kids-online-safety" />
			<id>https://www.theverge.com/?p=989769</id>
			<updated>2026-09-03T14:37:57-04:00</updated>
			<published>2026-09-03T14:37:57-04:00</published>
			<category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Creators" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Policy" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Politics" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Tech" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="TikTok" />
							<summary type="html"><![CDATA[TikTok backed out of a congressional committee’s “public roundtable” set for this month over concerns it would be asked about child safety practices, the chair of the committee said. After negotiating “in good faith” to bring TikTok’s chief security officer before the House Select Committee on China to answer questions about Chinese government access to [&#8230;]]]></summary>
			
							<content type="html">
											<![CDATA[

						
<figure>

<img alt="An illustration of the TikTok logo in front of the Capitol" data-caption="" data-portal-copyright="Image: Cath Virginia / The Verge, Getty Images" data-has-syndication-rights="1" src="https://platform.theverge.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2025/09/STK051_TIKTOKBAN2_CVirginia_A.jpg?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" />
	<figcaption>
		</figcaption>
</figure>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">TikTok backed out of a congressional committee’s “public roundtable” set for this month over concerns it would be asked about child safety practices, the chair of the committee <a href="https://chinaselectcommittee.house.gov/media/press-releases/tiktok-breaks-commitment-to-publicly-answer-questions-on-its-algorithm-s-ties-to-china">said</a>.</p>

<p class="wp-block-paragraph">After negotiating “in good faith” to bring TikTok’s chief security officer before the House Select Committee on China to answer questions about Chinese government access to Americans’ data and the TikTok algorithm, Chair John Moolenaar (R-MI) said in a statement Thursday that the company reversed course. “Now, TikTok is refusing to appear citing its own desire to avoid broader scrutiny of its child safety practices,” Moolenaar wrote. TikTok did not immediately respond to a request for comment.</p>

<p class="wp-block-paragraph">TikTok reneged on its commitment on August 27th, Moolenaar told <em>Bloomberg</em> in an interview — a day after <a href="https://www.theverge.com/policy/985032/meta-state-ag-kids-online-safety-settlement">Meta reached its sweeping settlement</a> with state attorneys general and <a href="https://www.theverge.com/policy/985556/meta-settlement-youtube-tiktok-snap">called on TikTok and YouTube to follow suit</a>. All three of those tech platforms <a href="https://www.theverge.com/policy/867830/social-media-trials-product-liability-school-districts">still have many pending suits</a> focused on their child safety practices. “They claimed that in light of Meta&#8217;s settlement with state attorneys general, they wouldn&#8217;t be able to answer questions on child-safety issues,&#8221; Moolenaar told <em>Bloomberg</em>, even though he said the meeting was not set to focus on that topic.&nbsp;</p>

<figure class="wp-block-pullquote"><blockquote><p>“They claimed that in light of Meta&#8217;s settlement with state attorneys general, they wouldn&#8217;t be able to answer questions on child-safety issues”</p></blockquote></figure>

<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Moolenaar said in his statement that the committee would attempt to reschedule. “We will continue to work in good faith to protect the American people and ensure TikTok executives publicly address the Committee’s questions regarding its operations and safeguards – consistent with the requirements of the Protecting Americans From Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act – before the end of the year.”</p>

<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The law Moolenaar references is the one that briefly banned TikTok from the US, before enforcement was repeatedly delayed by President Donald Trump. Ultimately, <a href="https://www.theverge.com/tech/866437/tiktok-usds-bytedance-sale-oracle-mgx">a deal to make its US service part of a new entity</a> closed in January, theoretically resolving the security issues the law cited. But lawmakers on the Select Committee had lingering concerns even after that happened. In a statement after the deal closed, Moolenaar said TikTok would need to answer questions about Chinese government influence on the algorithm and US data protection to the committee directly.</p>
						]]>
									</content>
			
					</entry>
			<entry>
			
			<author>
				<name>Lauren Feiner</name>
			</author>
			
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Google dodges another breakup attempt]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.theverge.com/policy/988316/google-ad-tech-antitrust-remedies-decision" />
			<id>https://www.theverge.com/?p=988316</id>
			<updated>2026-09-02T12:51:00-04:00</updated>
			<published>2026-09-02T11:42:17-04:00</published>
			<category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Antitrust" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Google" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Policy" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Politics" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Tech" />
							<summary type="html"><![CDATA[US District Court Judge Leonie Brinkema declined the Justice Department’s request to make Google sell off parts of its ad tech business, accepting milder remedies to restore competition to markets it illegally monopolized for years. Brinkema said she would adopt most of the behavioral changes proposed by the parties, with some modifications. But those won’t [&#8230;]]]></summary>
			
							<content type="html">
											<![CDATA[

						
<figure>

<img alt="An illustration showing the Google logo with a gavel" data-caption="" data-portal-copyright="Illustration by Cath Virginia / The Verge" data-has-syndication-rights="1" src="https://platform.theverge.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2025/03/236780_Google_AntiTrust_Trial_Custom_Art_CVirginia__0000_4.png?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" />
	<figcaption>
		</figcaption>
</figure>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">US District Court Judge Leonie Brinkema <a href="https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/66753787/1857/united-states-v-google-llc/">declined</a> the Justice Department’s request to make Google sell off parts of its ad tech business, accepting milder remedies to restore competition to markets it illegally monopolized for years.</p>

<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Brinkema said she would adopt most of the behavioral changes proposed by the parties, with some modifications. But those won’t become public until the parties meet to work out any additional proposed revisions and to review the judge’s opinion for confidential information that must be redacted. They could include proposals like restricting Google from using self-preferencing ad auction tactics or letting third-party ad tech tools access the same real-time information as Google.&nbsp;</p>

<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Once the final opinion comes out, Google can decide to appeal Brinkema’s underlying decision ruling it an illegal ad tech monopoly, <a href="https://www.theverge.com/news/863710/google-search-antitrust-monopoly-appeal">as it recently did</a> for a separate judgement that it had monopolized the online search market. In that case, Judge Amit Mehta also declined to go as far as a breakup, opting instead for Google to share data with competitors and alter its behavior.&nbsp;</p>

<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In the ad tech case, the DOJ successfully argued that Google had illegally monopolized the markets for publisher ad servers — where publishers can manage ad space for sale on their sites — and ad exchanges, which facilitate the auctions through which that ad space is sold. The judge agreed that Google had illegally tied its publisher ad server, Doubleclick for Publishers (DFP), and AdX ad exchange together in an anticompetitive manner that made it nearly impossible for customers to leave, degrading any competition. However, Brinkema found that the DOJ failed to prove Google illegally monopolized a market for advertiser-side tools. Ryan Pauley, president of <em>The Verge&#8217;s</em> parent company PMX Global, was deposed during the case.</p>

<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“We’re very pleased the Court rejected the DOJ&#8217;s proposal to break apart tools that help small businesses reach new customers and grow,” Google VP of regulatory affairs Lee-Anne Mulholland said in a statement. In a <a href="https://x.com/JusticeATR/status/2095188450349576226">statement on X</a>, the DOJ Antitrust Division said it was “pleased that the court ordered substantial relief” and that it was “evaluating appropriate next steps.” DOJ Associate AG Stanley Woodward Jr. <a href="https://x.com/ASGWoodward/status/2095188797692531163">added</a>, “The timing of the Court’s order reflects the tradeoffs between immediate relief and remedies obtained through years of litigation.”</p>

<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Google has been the subject of antitrust backlash under both Democratic and Republican administrations. During the Biden administration, <a href="https://www.theverge.com/24199314/jd-vance-donald-trump-vp-antitrust-big-tech-ftc-lina-khan-elizabeth-warren-google">then-Sen. JD Vance (R-OH) said Federal Trade Commission Chair Lina Khan</a> was “one of the few people in the Biden administration who I think is doing a pretty good job,&#8221; largely as a result of her scrutiny on tech.</p>

<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The remedies decision concludes the district court phase of the third major tech monopoly case brought by the federal government in recent years. Besides the two Google antitrust cases brought by the DOJ, the Federal Trade Commission brought a monopolization case against Meta, <a href="https://www.theverge.com/news/823191/meta-ftc-antitrust-trial-ruling">which it recently lost</a>, and trials between federal enforcers and <a href="https://www.theverge.com/2024/10/7/24264605/ftc-amazon-antitrust-motion-to-dismiss">Amazon</a> and <a href="https://www.theverge.com/2024/3/21/24105363/apple-doj-monopoly-lawsuit">Apple</a>, respectively, are expected to take place in the coming years.</p>
						]]>
									</content>
			
					</entry>
			<entry>
			
			<author>
				<name>Lauren Feiner</name>
			</author>
			
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Is this the future of America?]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.theverge.com/cs/features/975597/loudoun-county-virginia-data-center-backlash" />
			<id>https://www.theverge.com/?post_type=vm_custom_story&#038;p=975597</id>
			<updated>2026-09-02T15:47:03-04:00</updated>
			<published>2026-09-02T06:00:01-04:00</published>
			<category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Features" />
							<summary type="html"><![CDATA[In 2007, the US was on the cusp of an economic recession, and Buddy Rizer was tasked with finding Loudoun County, Virginia, a new way to make money. Rizer’s earlier career as a radio DJ didn’t exactly make him an obvious candidate to find a solution, but he was looking for what he called a [&#8230;]]]></summary>
			
							<content type="html">
											<![CDATA[

						
<figure>

<img alt="A still from an image of a drone shot of a Loudoun County data center." data-caption="" data-portal-copyright="" data-has-syndication-rights="1" src="https://platform.theverge.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2026/08/lede-poster.jpg?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" />
	<figcaption>
		</figcaption>
</figure>
<p class="has-drop-cap wp-block-paragraph">In 2007, the US was on the cusp of an economic recession, and Buddy Rizer was tasked with finding Loudoun County, Virginia, a new way to make money. Rizer’s earlier career as a radio DJ didn’t exactly make him an obvious candidate to find a solution, but he was looking for what he called a “real job” and stumbled into a role at Loudoun’s economic development authority.&nbsp;</p>

<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This new gig came with urgency thanks to the bursting of the housing bubble: More than 80 percent of the county’s revenue came from residential real estate. The goal, at the time, was to raise the commercial tax base from about 19 percent of revenue to something like 23 percent, Rizer recalls.<strong> </strong>Today, just over half of the county’s tax revenue comes from commercial sources. <strong>&nbsp;</strong>To jumpstart that turnaround, Rizer turned to the carcasses of another recent bubble burst — those of the dot-com era.</p>

<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The county had been home to the headquarters of AOL, which by 2000 was the US’s <a href="https://time.com/3857628/aol-1985-history/">largest internet provider</a>. Combined with its proximity to the nation’s capital and access to resources including water and electricity, Loudoun quickly emerged as the physical manifestation of the internet, the place responsible for how the majority of Americans got online. Estimates suggest that as much as 70 percent of the planet’s internet traffic passed through Loudoun County.</p>

<p class="wp-block-paragraph">But after the collapse of dot-com stocks in 2000, followed by AOL’s disastrous merger with Time Warner, much of that industry dried up, and Loudoun was left with hulking, empty buildings and miles of fiber optic cable already laid in the ground. Where some people saw abandoned infrastructure, Buddy Rizer saw opportunity: “And so I thought if we can fill those, that would be a good start,” he says. Rizer soon realized that the same factors that made Loudoun County attractive to AOL could once again make it a hot spot for technology. It still had an internet exchange point, lots of land, a government eager for investment, and a capable local electricity utility. “And so we came up with this plan to attract data centers.”</p>

<figure class="wp-block-gallery has-nested-images columns-2 is-cropped wp-block-gallery-1 is-layout-flex wp-block-gallery-is-layout-flex"><img src="https://platform.theverge.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2026/08/268652_Loudoun_VA_Data_Centers_SVoss_0010.jpg?quality=90&amp;strip=all&amp;crop=0,27.777777777778,100,44.444444444444" alt="Buddy Rizer, an older man wearing a suit, poses for a portrait near the window in his office." title="Buddy Rizer, an older man wearing a suit, poses for a portrait near the window in his office." data-has-syndication-rights="1" data-caption="Buddy Rizer, executive director for economic development in Loudoun County, has become known as the “Godfather of Data Centers” for courting the massive data center buildout to the area. | Photo: Stephen Voss for The Verge" data-portal-copyright="Photo: Stephen Voss for The Verge" />

<img src="https://platform.theverge.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2026/08/268652_Loudoun_VA_Data_Centers_SVoss_0002.jpg?quality=90&amp;strip=all&amp;crop=0,27.777777777778,100,44.444444444444" alt="Buddy Rizer, an older man wearing a suit, poses for a portrait near the window in his office." title="Buddy Rizer, an older man wearing a suit, poses for a portrait near the window in his office." data-has-syndication-rights="1" data-caption="&lt;p&gt;Buddy Rizer, executive director for economic development in Loudoun County, has become known as the “godfather of data centers” for courting the massive data center buildout to the area. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt; | Photo: Stephen Voss for The Verge" data-portal-copyright="Photo: Stephen Voss for The Verge" /></figure>

<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Today, Loudoun County has another moniker: Data Center Alley. Over just a small portion of its roughly 515 square miles, it’s home to about 250 data centers, the densest concentration in the world. For a long time, residents there recall only a passing understanding of this, if they realized it at all. The development of data centers in Loudoun was just something going on in the background of many residents’ lives. They noticed construction along main roads, paid an increasingly lower property tax rate, and sent their kids to coveted public schools.</p>

<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The county’s data center boom arrived as tech companies expanded into the cloud, a sanitized name for the blocky buildings that house rows and rows of servers. And with that business came prosperity: 22 new schools built in just the last 15 years, tax revenue from data centers alone that exceeded the county’s operational budget by $35 million in 2024, and a decline in real property tax rate for residents from about $1.29 to 80 cents per $100 in assessed value since 2008.</p>

<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Some longtime residents never heard of their county’s nickname until recently, when the effects of data centers on the community started to become impossible to ignore. What had been a relatively quiet boon locally was starting to foment a national backlash elsewhere, and starting to disturb daily life in Loudoun, too.</p>

<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The current, massive US data center buildout has been accelerating thanks to the widespread adoption of generative AI, which has created a growing need for the physical infrastructure to run tremendous amounts of “compute” — the industry term for processing power. There are already 3,000 data centers in operation around the US, according to an April <a href="https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2026/04/13/most-new-data-centers-in-the-us-are-coming-to-rural-areas/">analysis by the Pew Research Center</a>, with 1,500 more in development. When Rizer began recruiting companies to build data centers in Loudoun, he sat on conference panels for secondary markets. Now when he attends data center conferences, Loudoun is the biggest market there, and “there&#8217;s more economic developers than there are data center companies, because everybody sees the opportunity.”</p>

<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Loudoun County residents are also starting to take notice. Within the past few years, data centers have been elevated from an unremarkable part of daily life in Loudoun to something that many residents now think about every day. For some, it’s the constant hum they hear from their decks; for others, it’s the transmission towers that loom over their favorite green space, or the surprise call from their energy utility that one of those towers could go up in their own backyard. While residents recognize that data centers have brought a lot of prosperity to the county, they’re beginning to wonder how much more they can take.</p>

<p class="wp-block-paragraph">As communities around the country begin recognizing the potential opportunities of building data centers, the efforts have also faced immense pushback. Opposition to this development is shaping strange alliances across the political spectrum and has become a central issue in this year’s midterm elections. <a href="https://www.theverge.com/policy/965110/new-york-ai-data-center-moratorium">New York</a> and <a href="https://www.theverge.com/policy/975071/texas-data-center-audit">Texas</a> have begun pumping the brakes on new data center buildouts, worried about how their energy grids could support them without leaving residents stuck holding the bag if major tech players change plans. Local stories from around the country show that residents are coming out to community meetings in droves to oppose data centers. In at least one case, a violent attack on a local Indianapolis official <a href="https://www.pbs.org/newshour/nation/indianapolis-councilman-says-shots-fired-at-home-and-no-data-centers-note-left-at-door">appeared motivated</a> by his support for data centers. And <a href="https://news.gallup.com/poll/709772/americans-oppose-data-centers-area.aspx">national polls</a> show that many Americans <a href="https://www.pcmag.com/news/poll-majority-of-americans-dont-want-to-live-near-an-ai-data-center">do not want to live near them</a>.</p>

<p class="wp-block-paragraph">With its long history hosting data centers, Loudoun residents have more recently taken to calling it something new: the canary in the coal mine of data center development. Want to know what the country’s future looks like? Loudoun County’s past gives a strong glimpse of it.&nbsp;</p>

<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Even in Loudoun, where the existence of data centers has been a fact of life for nearly two decades, Rizer says that in the last few years, community opposition has become more vocal. “Before then, people understood what we were doing,” he says. These days, residents seem more aware of the inconveniences.</p>

<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Rizer is no stranger to this kind of response to his projects, but the tone of the pushback is different. Residents have always had myriad worries: economic, environmental, and aesthetic. That part isn’t new. “I&#8217;ve done $70 billion of deals here, and the only thing in common is that somebody&#8217;s been against every single one of them,” Rizer says. “I have never seen, in my entire career, the vitriol, the hate that is associated with this.” Asked to put his radio DJ hat on to choose a soundtrack for this moment, he chuckles and says the first one that jumps into his head is Taylor Swift’s “You Need to Calm Down.”&nbsp;</p>

<p class="wp-block-paragraph">As Rizer and other officials in Loudoun field their own residents’ concerns about data centers, they’re also being flooded with calls from local officials across the country looking for their advice. Rizer is the first to admit that hosting a data center, let alone hundreds, is not the right choice for every community. He stands by the work he’s done to bring them to Loudoun, and still believes they’ve benefited the county on the whole. But data center expansion in Loudoun has recently taken on a life of its own, to the point that even Rizer no longer spends his time courting new facilities. “We don&#8217;t want more data centers here, but we want those that are here to be successful and continue to contribute to our community,” he says, diplomatically.&nbsp;</p>

<p class="wp-block-paragraph">But new facilities are coming anyway, and even Rizer, the “<a href="https://www.wsj.com/finance/the-godfather-of-data-centers-making-offers-big-tech-cant-refuse-6c52d301">godfather of data centers</a>,” is powerless to stop them. Over a series of visits to Loudoun County, I wanted to see for myself what it’s like to cross through communities surrounded by the cloud. Is the data center future that so many across the country seem to fear all it’s been built up to be?</p>

<hr class="wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity" />

<figure class="wp-block-pullquote"><blockquote><p>“I have never seen, in my entire career, the vitriol, the hate that is associated with this.”</p></blockquote></figure>

<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Long before it became Data Center Alley, Loudoun County was already solidifying its role as the hometown of the modern internet. In 1996, <a href="https://www.insidenova.com/headlines/the-legacy-of-aol-a-look-back-at-the-company-s-impact-locally/article_9e20b274-9c38-11ee-8bd8-3fda4cd64e0f.html&apos;">AOL decided to move its headquarters</a> from neighboring Fairfax County to Loudoun, eventually <a href="https://www.insidenova.com/headlines/the-legacy-of-aol-a-look-back-at-the-company-s-impact-locally/article_9e20b274-9c38-11ee-8bd8-3fda4cd64e0f.html">employing more than 5,000 workers</a> in Ashburn at its peak in 2004. Soon, the first internet exchange point, MAE-East, would make a similar <a href="https://broadbandbreakfast.com/dateline-ashburn-the-interplay-between-ixps-and-data-centers/">move to Ashburn</a>, making Loudoun the physical location where much of the world’s internet traffic flowed. It was further solidified as a tech juggernaut when telecom company MCI WorldCom also opened a large office in the area, which <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2004/04/20/business/worldcom-changes-its-name-and-emerges-from-bankruptcy.html">became its headquarters in 2003</a>.&nbsp;</p>

<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The companies brought more than just jobs and a new workforce to the area. They also laid fiber underground across the county, attracting <a href="https://www.voanews.com/a/usa_all-about-america_heres-where-internet-actually-lives/6184090.html">other tech firms</a> to the area because of the convenient promise of low latency and proximity to the nation’s capital. The attention earned Loudoun nicknames like “<a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2011/06/the-silicon-valley-of-the-east-is-washington-dc/240055/">the Silicon Valley of the East</a>” and “<a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/business/wp/2018/06/22/feature/forget-silicon-valley-the-dulles-tech-corridor-is-cultivating-companies-that-break-the-mold/">Dulles Technology Corridor</a>,” after the nearby airport.</p>

<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For a while, AOL and MCI’s presence made Loudoun an unlikely but bustling tech hub. Between 1990 and 2000, the county population <a href="https://www.loudounchamber.org/history/">doubled to 170,000</a>. Early AOL employees have <a href="https://www.ashburnmagazine.com/features/the-legacy-of-aol-a-look-back-at-the-companys-impact-locally/">recounted lavish parties</a> thrown by the company in its heyday, including “go-go-style dancers” and a sushi conveyor belt around an airplane at the nearby annex of the Smithsonian National Air and Space Museum.&nbsp;</p>

<p class="wp-block-paragraph">During this time, data centers were already starting to pop up in Loudoun County, but with little fanfare. The first one arrived in 1997, and after that there was a slow drip of new data centers permitted in the area. In 2000, the local zoning administrator made a decision that would have lasting consequences later on, but made little noise at the time. Because data centers looked similar to offices, they became designated as “office parks,” meaning that they could be built on any land zoned for office space “by right” — bypassing more time-intensive regulatory review. That meant that unlike other commercial facilities like heavy machinery plants, which face more restrictions being built near populated residential areas, data centers could be built wherever offices had been allowed.</p>
<img src="https://platform.theverge.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2026/08/0007_268652_Loudoun_VA_Data_Centers_SVoss_0022B.jpg?quality=90&amp;strip=all&amp;crop=0,0,100,100" alt="A data center under construction in Sterling, Virginia." title="A data center under construction in Sterling, Virginia." data-has-syndication-rights="1" data-caption="&lt;p&gt;Data center construction like at this location in Sterling, Virginia, is a common sight all around Loudoun County.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt; | Photo: Stephen Voss for The Verge" data-portal-copyright="Photo: Stephen Voss for The Verge" />
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Then the dot-com bubble burst. In early 2000, AOL <a href="https://www.cnbc.com/video/2019/08/15/the-rise-and-fall-of-aol.html">announced a blockbuster merger</a> with Time Warner for more than $160 billion. But as the first wave of internet companies suffered sharp declines, AOL’s ad revenue tanked, and the country’s largest provider of dial-up internet was soon undercut further by the rise of faster cable broadband. MCI <a href="https://www.pbs.org/newshour/economy/business-july-dec02-worldcom_07-22">filed for bankruptcy</a> in 2002 after a major accounting scandal. By 2006, it was <a href="https://www.cnet.com/tech/tech-industry/verizon-closes-book-on-mci-merger/">acquired by Verizon</a>, and a year later, a much diminished AOL announced it would <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2007/09/17/technology/17cnd-adco.html">move its headquarters</a> to New York.</p>

<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Soon after came the financial downturn that became the Great Recession. Looking for unique ways to pitch the county, Rizer, then a newly minted business development manager, saw an opportunity in the recently emptied buildings and miles of fiber still lacing Loudoun’s roads. From 2002 to 2005, <a href="https://lfportal.loudoun.gov/LFPortalinternet/0/edoc/1817671/Item%2009%20Electrical%20Infrastructure%20Study.docx.pdf">no new data centers</a> had been permitted. In the years after Rizer began courting them, only a few were permitted per year, county data shows, but growth was slow and steady. Then, in 2014, the number of data centers permitted jumped to seven. Rizer recalls feeling like the county could finally start relying less on its taxes from residents and more on commercial revenue. “We were catching up on schools and catching up on salaries for our workforce,” he says. He recalls no pushback out of the ordinary on any development project, and says that for 15 years, “everybody loved the data centers because of the difference it made in our community.” In 2018, data center permits tripled to 21 in a year, and they reached a new peak in 2022 at 25.</p>
<img src="https://platform.theverge.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2026/08/0008_268652_Loudoun_VA_Data_Centers_SVoss_0022A.jpg?quality=90&amp;strip=all&amp;crop=0,0,100,100" alt="A dilapidated sign on AOL Way showing the site of the company’s first data center in Loudoun County." title="A dilapidated sign on AOL Way showing the site of the company’s first data center in Loudoun County." data-has-syndication-rights="1" data-caption="The remains of the first AOL data center in the area are in the process of being demolished to make way for a new data center. | Photo: Stephen Voss for The Verge" data-portal-copyright="Photo: Stephen Voss for The Verge" />
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Only those who were really paying attention seemed to notice that Loudoun was quickly becoming the data center capital of the world. Many longtime residents I spoke to sheepishly admit they hardly recognized Loudoun’s global reputation for data centers, though they perhaps passively noticed the new, blocky buildings that popped up along main roads or the tall transmission towers near their favorite running trail.&nbsp;</p>

<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Over the past 20 years, though, Loudoun residents have seen a direct impact of data centers on their lives, whether they knew it or not. Real property tax rates declined dramatically, while property values have gone up in some communities as much as 182 percent in the last decade, even at residences close to data centers, according to county officials. The county has paved smooth roads and built sprawling athletic fields, a recreation center with an Olympic-size pool, and an average of nearly one and a half state-of-the-art public school buildings every year for the past 15 years, all thanks largely to the revenue generated by the county taxes data center companies have to pay anytime they get new equipment. And while data centers have gotten a reputation for creating relatively few jobs once they’re constructed, the county <a href="https://23372029.fs1.hubspotusercontent-na1.net/hubfs/23372029/Website%20Files/Data%20Center%20Fact%20Sheet%20One%20Pager%205.1.25.pdf">says</a> that for every job inside those buildings, three and a half non-construction jobs are “supported” throughout the rest of the state economy. Those include ongoing maintenance at data centers, like electricians or HVAC technicians, and employment at other tech companies that move to Loudoun to be near where the data lives.&nbsp;</p>

<p class="wp-block-paragraph">While the data centers take advantage of a long-standing tax exemption from the state, Rizer emphasizes that the county has never spent a dime to attract them to the area. “A majority of the people that live here now only know prosperity, only know the strongest local economy in the country, only know great services and great schools,” Rizer says. “And so they don&#8217;t necessarily connect to that. They don&#8217;t see that common thread between the fact that the data centers are here and they have a great quality of life.”</p>
<img src="https://platform.theverge.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2026/08/0001_268652_Loudoun_VA_Data_Centers_SVoss_0070.jpg?quality=90&amp;strip=all&amp;crop=0,0,100,100" alt="A soccer goal post at Hal and Berni Hanson Regional Park with transmission towers in the background." title="A soccer goal post at Hal and Berni Hanson Regional Park with transmission towers in the background." data-has-syndication-rights="1" data-caption="Soccer fields at Hal and Berni Hanson Regional Park have been made possible through data center tax revenue. | Photo: Stephen Voss for The Verge" data-portal-copyright="Photo: Stephen Voss for The Verge" />
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">My most recent visit to Loudoun is on a July day when wildfire smoke that’s wafted down from Canada has <a href="https://www.loudounnow.com/news/parks-and-rec-cancels-events-closes-pools-amid-code-purple-air-quality-alert/article_3423df59-052c-4e70-98a2-5061fc52259c.html">sent air quality into a Code Purple</a>. The ashy filter makes the grayish buildings all around look especially drab, though when I visit a local bike trail lined with trees and transmission towers, I still see plenty of cyclists braving the AQI that <a href="https://www.deq.virginia.gov/news-info/shortcuts/topics-of-interest/data-center-air-monitoring-project">exceeds 200</a> in some spots.</p>

<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Julie Bolthouse, a longtime Loudoun resident who grew up across northern Virginia, drives me by the old AOL campus and points out a building with a playground on the other side of the street. “That used to be a major daycare center here in the heart of Data Center Alley, because there were so many people who worked here,” she says. “Now it&#8217;s just these big, giant computer energy-guzzling, water-guzzling warehouses.”</p>
<img src="https://platform.theverge.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2026/08/0000_268652_Loudoun_VA_Data_Centers_SVoss_0077.jpg?quality=90&amp;strip=all&amp;crop=0,0,100,100" alt="A poster of a girls’ team hangs on a fence at a field of a Loudoun County public high school." title="A poster of a girls’ team hangs on a fence at a field of a Loudoun County public high school." data-has-syndication-rights="1" data-caption="Loudoun County officials say that tax revenue generated from data centers benefits public schools like Independence High School. | Photo: Stephen Voss for The Verge" data-portal-copyright="Photo: Stephen Voss for The Verge" />
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The lot where the old AOL campus sat is now filled with construction equipment and several-story buildings. The old headquarters has been demolished to make way for — you guessed it — more data centers.&nbsp;</p>

<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Throughout Loudoun, Bolthouse remembers land that now houses data centers being home to business centers and dentist’s offices. She returned to the area after college, enjoying that it made an easy trip to both DC and Virginia’s Shenandoah National Park, and feeling comfortable in an area that’s generally not prone to major weather events like hurricanes. In 2017, the organization she joined, Piedmont Environmental Council (PEC), began tracking the impact of data centers on the local environment. A year later, Loudoun’s Board of Supervisors had one of its most contentious votes ever, <a href="https://www.loudounnow.com/archives/loudoun-supervisors-approve-controversial-goose-creek-data-center/article_4c526b11-0bc6-5f6a-b526-71ed527a6c3d.html">narrowly approving a 750,000-square-foot data center</a> spanning over 100 wooded acres near Goose Creek. Groups like PEC loudly objected to the development over environmental concerns, while those in favor of the proposal argued development would happen there regardless; it was just a matter of what would get built.</p>
<img src="https://platform.theverge.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2026/08/0003_268652_Loudoun_VA_Data_Centers_SVoss_0051.jpg?quality=90&amp;strip=all&amp;crop=0,0,100,100" alt="A data center viewed in a side mirror of a car in Ashburn, Virginia." title="A data center viewed in a side mirror of a car in Ashburn, Virginia." data-has-syndication-rights="1" data-caption="Data centers have become a regular sight and part of daily life in Ashburn, Virginia. | Photo: Stephen Voss for The Verge" data-portal-copyright="Photo: Stephen Voss for The Verge" />
<figure class="wp-block-pullquote"><blockquote><p>“Everybody loved the data centers because of the difference it made in our community”</p></blockquote></figure>

<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Today, Bolthouse is the director of land use at PEC and helps lead a <a href="https://www.pecva.org/region/regional-state-national-region/general-assembly/virginia-data-center-reform-coalition/">coalition of Virginia groups</a> that advocate for stronger protections, tracking, and transparency around data center development. Bolthouse isn’t dispositionally anti-data center, nor does she want to see existing ones in the area torn down or shut off. But she does advocate for a pause on new development. “This industry is kind of creating a narrative that they&#8217;re up against communities, and that there&#8217;s a community backlash, and we just need to explain to the communities the benefits of data centers,” she says. “But what they&#8217;re really up against is physics. They&#8217;re up against the reality of what it takes to build out gigawatts of power, and the impact of building out gigawatts of power has direct impacts on people.”</p>

<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Recently, she’s found, more of her neighbors are paying attention. She recalls 2025 as a turning point, where PEC no longer had to do the legwork to get people invested, but instead was triaging which press requests would make the most impact given its limited capacity. And for residents, data centers were becoming more than just eyesores. They were beginning to disrupt life in Loudoun.</p>

<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Vicky Hu lives in a red brick<strong> </strong>home on a cul-de-sac beside a peaceful, tree-lined stream. Her backyard stretches far along the water, where a white gazebo gives shade to sit and watch the deer she says regularly cross her yard. Including her mother and daughter, three generations of Hu’s family have lived in this house. Having grown up in the city of Taipei, Hu marveled at the nature that surrounded her new home: deer as well as turtles and cranes. “To me, this is like a dream. My dream home,” she tells me.</p>
<img src="https://platform.theverge.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2026/08/0000_268652_Loudoun_VA_Data_Centers_SVoss_0064.jpg?quality=90&amp;strip=all&amp;crop=0,0,100,100" alt="Madison Taggart stands in her backyard among trees marked by pink ribbons to show where a proposed transmission tower would go." title="Madison Taggart stands in her backyard among trees marked by pink ribbons to show where a proposed transmission tower would go." data-has-syndication-rights="1" data-caption="Madison Taggart says she doesn’t want to think about what her childhood backyard would be like if forced to adopt a transmission tower. | Photo: Stephen Voss for The Verge" data-portal-copyright="Photo: Stephen Voss for The Verge" />
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Until last year, when Hu got a call that pierced that dream. She got a voicemail from a Dominion Energy representative and first wondered if there was an issue with her energy bill payment. Instead, she was told that a new transmission line connecting two substations<strong> </strong>would cut directly through her backyard. “Are you out of your fucking mind?” she yelled at the rep.</p>

<p class="wp-block-paragraph">On the day I visit, the gazebo is filled with poster boards of blown-up maps of the community — and new development plans that threaten to overtake it. The trees along the stream are tagged with bright pink ribbons tied around their trunks. They mark the land Hu’s family says would be cleared should Dominion Energy’s plan to string 185-foot transmission towers through their backyard go through as planned. “It&#8217;s like the sort of thing you only think you&#8217;d see in a dystopian nightmare,” Hu’s daughter, 23-year-old Madison Taggart, tells me as she shows me around her childhood home.</p>

<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Growing up, Taggart says that home always felt “like a timeless place that no one else could touch.” Hu bought it shortly after her daughter was born, having seen the community built from the ground up. She worked for a developer and recalls watching workers bury power and communication lines beneath the community from her trailer across the road. By 2003, she’d nearly finished selling the community, except for one lot that was reserved for a VP at her company. As Hu’s aging mother struggled with the stairs in her townhome, she kept thinking about that lot on the cul-de-sac next to the water. She asked her colleague if she could buy it, and two years later, she moved in.&nbsp;&nbsp;</p>

<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Now, Hu is engaged in a yearlong fight to redirect the transmission line to another route — one that, so far, she’s on the losing end of, pending an appeal to the Supreme Court of Virginia. After that first phone call, Hu said she ran around the neighborhood “like a crazy woman,” ringing doorbells and asking if anyone had heard of the proposal. She said they hadn’t. By the time I visit, a sign in her backyard shows a diagram of the proposed 185-foot transmission tower next to a comparatively stout Statue of Liberty (if you exclude the base she stands on).</p>

<figure class="wp-block-pullquote"><blockquote><p>“That used to be a major daycare center here in the heart of Data Center Alley, because there were so many people who worked here. Now it&#8217;s just these big, giant computer energy-guzzling, water-guzzling warehouses.”</p></blockquote></figure>

<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Dominion insists that building the transmission line is necessary to power not only data centers, but also homes, businesses, schools, and hospitals. The local school district has been dragged into the fight over the route as well, though, with one proposal cutting close to two nearby schools. Hu’s homeowners association donated a portion of land that would be cut through to the school district, preventing it from being seized by eminent domain.&nbsp;</p>

<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Both the school district and residents in Hu’s community have been fighting the planned routes, and worry that the expansion could signal even more encroachment on key facets of the community down the road. “There&#8217;s also a deep concern for having this be a precedent that it could normalize easing the planning by just putting them on school property,” says April Chandler, Loudoun County School Board chair. Her concerns are with the kids and faculty of her community. “As a school board member, it&#8217;s not my job necessarily to consider what&#8217;s best for Dominion Energy or for data centers.”</p>
<img src="https://platform.theverge.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2026/08/0002_268652_Loudoun_VA_Data_Centers_SVoss_0067.jpg?quality=90&amp;strip=all&amp;crop=0,0,100,100" alt="A sign in Loudoun Valley Estates compares the size of a proposed transmission tower to the Statue of Liberty." title="A sign in Loudoun Valley Estates compares the size of a proposed transmission tower to the Statue of Liberty." data-has-syndication-rights="1" data-caption="Dominion Energy’s proposed transmission tower would loom taller than the Statue of Liberty. | Photo: Stephen Voss for The Verge" data-portal-copyright="Photo: Stephen Voss for The Verge" />
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Despite working or living in Loudoun since 2000, Hu had never heard the nickname “Data Center Alley” until last year, when a Swiss reporter came to interview her about life in the data center capital of the world. Now, she can’t unhear it. She notices transmission towers everywhere she goes. And she worries nowhere is truly safe from the ever-expanding buildout. “This is just the first power line coming through a neighborhood. Where do you think the rest of the power lines [are] going to go through?” she asks. She predicts that in the next five to 10 years, “when you look at the sky in Ashburn … you&#8217;re going to see a power line running everywhere, like a spiderweb.”</p>

<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Should she lose the fight to preserve her backyard, Hu says she’d have no choice but to leave. “Do I want to stay here sitting on my deck watching the power pole? … Or should I stay here for a couple years to see if I&#8217;m going to get cancer or a brain tumor?” She has lost sleep and hair fretting over how to save her home this past year. “It&#8217;s just very sad,” she says. “You‘re thinking, ‘You work your whole life, you own something.’ But you actually don&#8217;t own it, because a power company can say, ‘I like your house. I want to take it.’”</p>

<hr class="wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity" />

<p class="wp-block-paragraph">As I get out of the car a couple blocks down from the Vantage VA2 data center, I can already hear the whirring. Because I visited on a day with such poor air quality, what I’m told are usually invisible emissions plumes make a faint outline in the smoggy air. They’re emitted, Bolthouse tells me, by the diesel generators powering the facility. She compares the noise to that of a lawn mower. (I later find out that the generators are never supposed to run on day with such poor air quality, but an emergency circuit issue required them to kick in temporarily.)</p>

<p class="wp-block-paragraph">It doesn’t always sound like a lawn mower, though. Other days, the gas turbines that power the data center make an even more annoying high-pitched squealing noise, nearby residents like Lindsay Shaw tell me. We meet while she’s out for a walk with her dog, and she describes the way the sound permeates into her home. Constant light from the data center shines right into her bedroom at night unless the bathroom door is fully closed. Her fiancé has taken to wearing an eye mask.</p>

<figure class="wp-block-gallery has-nested-images columns-2 is-cropped wp-block-gallery-2 is-layout-flex wp-block-gallery-is-layout-flex"><img src="https://platform.theverge.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2026/08/0001_268652_Loudoun_VA_Data_Centers_SVoss_0041.jpg?quality=90&amp;strip=all&amp;crop=0,27.777777777778,100,44.444444444444" alt="Piedmont Environmental Council land use director Julie Bolthouse stands in front of the blue Vantage VA2 data center in Ashburn, Virginia." title="Piedmont Environmental Council land use director Julie Bolthouse stands in front of the blue Vantage VA2 data center in Ashburn, Virginia." data-has-syndication-rights="1" data-caption="Piedmont Environmental Council land use director Julie Bolthouse worries about how Loudoun will keep up with the energy demands imposed by data center expansion. | Photo: Stephen Voss for The Verge" data-portal-copyright="Photo: Stephen Voss for The Verge" />

<img src="https://platform.theverge.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2026/08/0002_268652_Loudoun_VA_Data_Centers_SVoss_0038.jpg?quality=90&amp;strip=all&amp;crop=0,27.777777777778,100,44.444444444444" alt="Piedmont Environmental Council land use director Julie Bolthouse stands in front of the blue Vantage VA2 data center in Ashburn, Virginia." title="Piedmont Environmental Council land use director Julie Bolthouse stands in front of the blue Vantage VA2 data center in Ashburn, Virginia." data-has-syndication-rights="1" data-caption="Piedmont Environmental Council land use director Julie Bolthouse worries about how Loudoun will keep up with the energy demands imposed by data center expansion. | Photo: Stephen Voss for The Verge" data-portal-copyright="Photo: Stephen Voss for The Verge" /></figure>

<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Nobody wanted it this way. In an ideal world, Vantage would have done what hundreds of other data centers in the area have done and connected to the Dominion energy grid by the time the site went online last year. But after Vantage had already signed agreements with customers leasing space in the new data center, Dominion informed Vantage it didn’t have enough capacity to get the 800,000-square-foot data center on the grid. Rather than let the building sit dormant until Dominion built up capacity, Vantage decided to create its own energy source using gas turbines. This is becoming more and more common in other parts of the country, as the new AI-motivated data centers require vastly more energy than the old cloud servers.&nbsp;</p>

<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Residents and local politicians acknowledge that the Vantage site is an outlier because of its unusual reliance on on-site generated power from natural gas — albeit a very annoying one. Before it was built, Shaw tells me she thought a data center would be among the best options that could come to the lot across the street, in part because it wouldn’t be something that would drive a lot of traffic near what she says is an already dangerous intersection. But now she says the data center has caused plenty of other problems and feels the operators have not been proactive enough in engaging neighbors. Vantage’s senior vice president of global public policy, John Stephenson, says he “would respectfully disagree” that they haven’t proactively engaged nearby residents. He notes that they held a community meeting at a nearby brewery to field questions early on, but admits that “in retrospect, we probably could have done more.” The company has taken different approaches to mitigate the noise, including installing insulation and repositioning the turbines to lower their tone.&nbsp;</p>

<p class="wp-block-paragraph">But residents who live near other data centers throughout Loudoun — even those that don’t have to generate their own power on-site — also complain of noise. Jason Mello says he hears a constant “low-frequency drone” he attributes to the HVAC systems of nearby data centers from his Ashburn home. Living near Dulles Airport, many Ashburn residents are used to the sound of planes overhead, “but planes come and go. The data center hum never stops.”</p>

<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Mello shows me videos of the noise from his deck outside a town hall meeting where we meet. He says he’s already spent $2,600 getting two new window inserts, with three more to go in his bedroom. He was quoted at least $15,000 for new siding that would further mitigate the noise. “As a homeowner, if I want to live in peace at night, that addresses the inside,” he says, “but if I&#8217;m sitting on my deck, I can constantly hear that humming. And I think that&#8217;s why you got to fix the problem also at the source.”</p>

<figure class="wp-block-pullquote"><blockquote><p>“You’re thinking, ‘You work your whole life, you own something.’ But you actually don&#8217;t own it, because a power company can say, ‘I like your house. I want to take it.’”</p></blockquote></figure>
<img src="https://platform.theverge.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2026/08/0004_268652_Loudoun_VA_Data_Centers_SVoss_0033.jpg?quality=90&amp;strip=all&amp;crop=0,0,100,100" alt="A neighborhood of nice houses in Sterling, Virginia, sits right next to a boxy and industrial-looking data center." title="A neighborhood of nice houses in Sterling, Virginia, sits right next to a boxy and industrial-looking data center." data-has-syndication-rights="1" data-caption="Data centers have become next-door neighbors for many Loudoun County residents. | Photo: Stephen Voss for The Verge" data-portal-copyright="Photo: Stephen Voss for The Verge" />
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Several residents tell me that the boom in infrastructure needed to support the data centers has impacted their ability to enjoy the natural resources of Loudoun that once attracted them. “You can barely hear the birds anymore,” says Jessica Medeiros, another resident who lives across the street from the Vantage data center. Even when she tries to retreat from the noise near her home, she’s regularly reminded of the data centers’ presence. As a regular runner on the famed Washington and Old Dominion trail for the past 20 years, Medeiros says the “constant construction,” towering power lines, and reduced shade because of cleared trees “ruins the experience with nature.” She often says that when she dies, “I want my ashes scattered along the trail. But I think that trail&#8217;s going to look a lot different in another 10 years.”</p>

<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“The greenery is gone. The sense of community is gone. It feels very stale,” says Jenny Marza, another Loudoun County resident. “There&#8217;s no more trees left and every inch is taken up by greed.”&nbsp;</p>

<p class="wp-block-paragraph">While fighting new development near her own home, Marza has already felt pressure from the data center explosion on her small export logistics business. For years she’s been looking at buying office and warehouse space in the area to be near the airport, but prices have been so astronomical that she’s been forced to continue leasing. Now, even her current office rent has skyrocketed — she suspects because every landlord knows that data centers are willing <a href="https://www.loudounnow.com/news/loudoun-land-data-center-values-soar-while-home-assessments-hold-steady/article_d7977ab6-f33b-4dc2-8203-d53bc9a8ebc4.html">to pay an average of $3.76 million per acre</a>.</p>

<figure class="wp-block-pullquote"><blockquote><p>It doesn’t always sound like a lawn mower, though. Other days, the gas turbines that power the data center make an even more annoying high-pitched squealing noise.</p></blockquote></figure>

<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Marza says “I’m kicking myself” over a warehouse she came close to buying last year for around $5 million, but held off because it was more space than she needed at the time. “And then we put a pause on the search for two years and when we returned, it was like, ‘Holy crap, there&#8217;s nothing left.’” Anything that was selling at $5 million was now $10 million. To Marza, the residential property tax savings and increased home values mean little when compared to the quality-of-life concerns she has and the ability to help her small business survive. “I feel like it&#8217;s a drop in the ocean of what they&#8217;re getting in return,” she says. “I feel like nobody protected our interests as a community.”</p>

<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Done the right way, you can be good neighbors,” Shaw says, reflecting on the Vantage site near her home. “But this one was done like that shady neighbor next door that has people coming in and out all hours of the night. And then the FBI raids them and you&#8217;re like, ‘Well, I knew something shady was going on.’”</p>

<hr class="wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity" />

<p class="wp-block-paragraph">When I arrive at the Loudoun government building on a July evening shortly before 6:30PM, I’m handed a red flyer outside <a href="https://www.wepowerloudoun.com/">by a group</a> advocating for local government control of utilities used to power data centers. Inside, the nearly full room is prominently speckled with light blue shirts that read “I support data centers.” The shirts list the reasons: “Because I like: lower taxes, excellent schools, better job opportunities.” They also include caveats: “When they are: in the right location, well-designed, quiet, environmentally sensitive.” The slogan doesn’t exactly roll off the tongue.</p>

<p class="wp-block-paragraph">I comfortably score a seat, but later hear complaints from some attendees who say they arrived shortly after me and were relegated to the overflow room. Though it’s a first-come-first-served event, those critical of data centers grumble that industry supporters seem suspiciously well organized in their early arrivals.</p>

<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Still, it doesn’t have the kind of fireworks or soundbites that have made community meetings about data centers around the country into national news. While some residents voice strong frustration, the two-and-a-half-hour forum is cordial and respectful of Board of Supervisors Chair Phyllis Randall’s request of no cheering nor jeering.</p>

<figure class="wp-block-pullquote"><blockquote><p>“Planes come and go. The data center hum never stops.”</p></blockquote></figure>
<img src="https://platform.theverge.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2026/08/0005_268652_Loudoun_VA_Data_Centers_SVoss_0030.jpg?quality=90&amp;strip=all&amp;crop=0,0,100,100" alt="A data center peeks out from behind the trees outside Tippett’s Hill Cemetery." title="A data center peeks out from behind the trees outside Tippett’s Hill Cemetery." data-has-syndication-rights="1" data-caption="Tippett’s Hill Cemetery, one of the oldest African American cemeteries in the area, is surrounded by data centers. | Photo: Stephen Voss for The Verge" data-portal-copyright="Photo: Stephen Voss for The Verge" />
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Randall is in a tough spot. As head of the <a href="https://www.loudoun.gov/4162/About-the-Board">elected nine-member panel</a> tasked with adopting local ordinances, appropriating funds, and rezoning land, Randall has just enough power for her constituents to lay responsibility for their criticism at her feet, yet not enough to change some of the things she says she wishes she could. At the meeting, she listens to residents’ concerns, promising to follow up with phone calls for some while repeatedly acknowledging and lamenting the quality-of-life frustrations many of her neighbors have about living near data centers. But she also declines to give ground on topics she said are unfounded or detached from political reality.&nbsp;</p>

<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Randall walks residents through the history of data centers in Loudoun, including what they are and how they came to be zoned the same way as office parks. Before getting to the audience participation portion, she clicks to a slide that says “4 Things That Are Unpopular But True” with a grimace emoji. The first: At one point in time, residents actually <em>preferred</em> data centers over new housing developments. She references opposition to a 2021 proposal to build up to 779 residential housing units in Ashburn, called Hyde Park. Across about 125 comments, residents <a href="https://www.bizjournals.com/washington/news/2023/02/02/data-center-loudoun-viewpoint-breaking-ground.html">reportedly worried</a> about increased traffic and infrastructure strain. Nearly two years after submitting the application, the developer withdrew and decided to establish a by-right data center there instead. “One of my worst days was January 5th, 2023, when the applicant called me and said, ‘Forget it. I&#8217;m going to go build a data center,’” Randall says. “And I pretty much begged them not to.”</p>

<figure class="wp-block-pullquote"><blockquote><p>“So do you want them? And if you do, where do you want them? How many do you want? And under what conditions would you take them?”</p></blockquote></figure>

<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The second unpopular truth: It’s not legal for Loudoun to enact a moratorium on development without the state’s permission.&nbsp;</p>

<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Third: Both the Biden and Trump administrations have indicated AI infrastructure buildout will be a national priority, so that’s unlikely to change anytime soon.&nbsp;</p>

<p class="wp-block-paragraph">And fourth: Despite resident backlash to certain data center land use exceptions the board has granted, the alternative would have been that those data centers could take the land by right anyway, with much less in return. The lesson being, if data centers can break ground whether government officials want them to or not, the county might as well get something out of it.</p>

<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Residents who speak at the hearing do not dispute her account of the county’s history. Many express frustration about the buildings encroaching on greenery or creating annoying and near-constant noise issues.<strong> </strong>But<strong> </strong>many others, including several in the blue shirts, argue in support of data centers as stewards of the community they are proud to be known for. One Ashburn resident describes a peaceful experience living across from a data center. “When the weather is good, I&#8217;ll open my bedroom windows, from which I can see it directly. It is silent, it is clean. It is a good neighbor,” he says. Another resident, who leads the nonprofit Northern Virginia Science Center Foundation, credits data centers with generating revenue that can help fund such endeavors to a greater degree than it sees in nearby Fairfax. The organization lists Loudoun County, Dominion Energy, and data center company QTS among its partners.&nbsp;</p>

<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Randall affirms residents’ data center complaints, but also fact-checks several claims about supposed data center projects she says never existed in the first place. One Ashburn resident, for example, bemoans what he calls the “Ashburn Commons proposal” that would create a blight next to existing housing, greenery, and other community institutions. Randall asks him to clarify if he is thinking about a proposal near the Harris Teeter grocery store.&nbsp;</p>

<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Yes!” he answers.&nbsp;</p>

<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“That’s not real,” Randall says. Her colleague adds the would-be developer hasn’t even submitted a formal application for it, and the government had denied an initial request.&nbsp;</p>

<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Well,” the resident cries out, “praise the Lord on that!”&nbsp;</p>

<hr class="wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity" />

<figure class="wp-block-pullquote"><blockquote><p>“I don’t want to be the example of what <em>not</em> to do.”</p></blockquote></figure>

<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For all the gripes, I’ve still yet to meet anyone in Loudoun County who actually says they oppose data centers entirely. Whether they’re currently living next to gas turbines or their backyard could potentially be seized to build a transmission tower, Loudoun residents still recognize that data centers help power the technology we use every day. After all, they need to go <em>somewhere</em>. Why not there?</p>

<p class="wp-block-paragraph">But even if Loudoun residents have accepted the economic benefits as a tradeoff for the loud eyesores near their homes, it doesn’t mean they’re open to an expansion of that deal.</p>

<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“It&#8217;s not about trying to get rid of the existing data centers. These data centers are here. They&#8217;re running. I don&#8217;t want them to go anywhere,” Bolthouse says. “The question isn&#8217;t, ‘Do we need data centers?’ The question is, ‘Is it worth threatening our air quality, threatening our water supply, and throwing our communities into chaos, and taking people&#8217;s private land for transmission lines to get it?’”</p>

<p class="wp-block-paragraph">I spoke with over half a dozen Loudoun residents, and universally, this is what they want communities considering data centers to understand: Know what you’re getting into. That means making sure existing laws and ordinances will apply to data centers, that local utilities have a plan to ensure enough capacity for the expected buildout, and that neither data centers nor the infrastructure needed to power them can be built too close to homes or schools.&nbsp;</p>

<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Even Rizer says the buildout in Loudoun has, in some places, gone beyond what he’d have hoped. “There&#8217;s no data centers here that aren&#8217;t where they&#8217;re allowed to be, but I think sometimes there&#8217;s a difference between what you&#8217;re allowed to do and what is probably best for the community,” he says. “And that&#8217;s what we&#8217;ve had to clean up a little bit.” At the town hall, Randall showed aerial images of several residential communities that were directly bordered by data centers. Those arrangements are not what any Loudoun official or resident considers ideal — but even so, she said, property values in those communities have only gone up.&nbsp;&nbsp;</p>

<p class="wp-block-paragraph">There are limits. Loudoun hasn’t had a strategic focus on bringing in more data centers since 2019, Rizer says. More recently, the local government is <a href="https://virginiamercury.com/2026/07/30/loudoun-county-other-virginia-localities-consider-hitting-the-brakes-on-data-center-development/">pursuing a plan</a> to pump the brakes further — doing away with the ability for data centers to use office-zoned land by right, and considering pausing new permit reviews while contemplating zoning changes that could better address community impacts.</p>

<p class="wp-block-paragraph">When peers around the country contact him about whether they should invite data centers into their communities, Rizer says, “It&#8217;s not right for every place. So do you want them? And if you do, where do you want them? How many do you want? And under what conditions would you take them?”</p>

<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For Loudoun, unlike many yet-to-be-developed areas in the US, there is a definitive end in sight. The county has an ever-diminishing amount of space left to develop data centers, after which point it will continue to collect tax revenue when the companies update equipment within their walls.&nbsp;</p>

<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Loudoun residents hope that by the time it gets to that point, the things that they love about the area are still there. For many, it’s the convenience of living near DC, but still close to nature. It’s also often about the quality public schools, funded in part with the revenue raised by the colossal energy-guzzling slabs in their backyards.</p>
<img src="https://platform.theverge.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2026/08/0006_268652_Loudoun_VA_Data_Centers_SVoss_0022.jpg?quality=90&amp;strip=all&amp;crop=0,0,100,100" alt="HVAC units on the roof of a data center along Loudoun County Parkway." title="HVAC units on the roof of a data center along Loudoun County Parkway." data-has-syndication-rights="1" data-caption="HVAC units on top of data centers can contribute to the loud noise many residents complain about. | Photo: Stephen Voss for The Verge" data-portal-copyright="Photo: Stephen Voss for The Verge" />
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">AOL’s roots helped make Loudoun the first major data center capital, and that came with both advantages and challenges. For communities starting to consider their first data center today, Bolthouse says they’re in a much better position than Loudoun was because the industry isn’t yet “embedded” in layers of government. She still thinks their story could become a beacon of hope for others, rather than a warning — but it’s an uphill battle to get there.&nbsp;</p>

<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“I don&#8217;t want to be the example of what <em>not</em> to do,” she says. “I want to be the example of what <em>to</em> do. I want to bring journalists out to see how we fixed problems, how we are doing much better, and how communities are happy with these facilities because they&#8217;ve done something better.” Hearing Bolthouse’s frustration with the ever-expanding energy demands imposed by data centers, it’s surprising to hear her embrace the ones that are already here. But for all the friction they’ve caused in her community recently, it’s also clear from my visits and conversations that data centers have played a central role in supporting many positive aspects of life in Loudoun. The question, now, is whether Loudoun can manage its existing demand and successfully serve community needs as the data center footprint continues to grow.&nbsp;</p>

<p class="wp-block-paragraph">If Bolthouse sounds optimistic, she is certain that something has to give. In the past, Loudoun’s data center buildout was quiet and steady. Today’s is anything but. “I don&#8217;t see how that happens with the scale and speed to market that the industry is pursuing.”</p>
						]]>
									</content>
			
					</entry>
			<entry>
			
			<author>
				<name>Lauren Feiner</name>
			</author>
			
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Tim Cook’s legacy isn’t just phones, it’s politics]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.theverge.com/policy/987356/tim-cook-apple-trump-xi" />
			<id>https://www.theverge.com/?p=987356</id>
			<updated>2026-09-01T09:51:02-04:00</updated>
			<published>2026-09-01T09:51:02-04:00</published>
			<category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Apple" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Policy" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Politics" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Tech" />
							<summary type="html"><![CDATA[As much as any Apple product released during his time as CEO, Tim Cook’s tenure will be remembered for its ruthlessly efficient tight-rope walk between an autocrat in China and a would-be autocrat in the US. During his 15 years as CEO, Cook steered Apple through relations with both Chinese President Xi Jinping and US [&#8230;]]]></summary>
			
							<content type="html">
											<![CDATA[

						
<figure>

<img alt="Photo illustration of Tim Cook." data-caption="" data-portal-copyright="Illustration by Cath Virginia / The Verge | Photo by Justin Sullivan, Getty Images" data-has-syndication-rights="1" src="https://platform.theverge.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/25345071/STK468_APPLE_ANTITRUST_CVIRGINIA_I.jpg?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" />
	<figcaption>
		</figcaption>
</figure>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">As much as any Apple product released during his time as CEO, Tim Cook’s tenure will be remembered for its ruthlessly efficient tight-rope walk between an autocrat in China and a would-be autocrat in the US.</p>

<p class="wp-block-paragraph">During his 15 years as CEO, Cook steered Apple through relations with both Chinese President Xi Jinping and US President Donald Trump, including escalating conflicts between the two. As Apple’s enmeshment in China raised serious questions about reports of forced labor and censorship, Cook managed to appease Xi while maneuvering around political blowback in the US. And when Trump launched a trade war against China, Cook managed to <a href="https://www.cnbc.com/2025/05/12/trump-apple-china-tariff-rollback.html">soften</a> the <a href="https://www.theverge.com/2019/12/12/21019667/apple-iphone-china-us-trade-war-trump-deal-reached-price-hike">blow</a> through his White House diplomacy. Cook’s ability to thread the needle between two superpowers helped expand Apple into a multi-trillion-dollar company, while downplaying concerns about civil rights, working conditions, and other serious issues.</p>

<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Cook was the executive who had <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/22/business/apple-america-and-a-squeezed-middle-class.html">helped solidify Apple’s manufacturing prowess in China</a>, even before stepping into the role as CEO in 2011. Once at the helm, he had to navigate questions of <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-switch/wp/2015/10/12/china-is-happy-to-have-apples-iphones-its-news-app-not-so-much/">censorship</a>, <a href="https://www.reuters.com/article/2014/08/15/us-apple-data-china-idUSKBN0GF0N720140815/">data privacy</a>, and forced or child <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2013/jan/25/apple-child-labour-supply">labor reports</a> even before Trump ascended to the presidency. He <a href="https://www.cnbc.com/2023/11/16/xi-dinner-with-us-ceos-tim-cook-elon-musk-steve-schwarzman-spotted.html">repeatedly</a> <a href="https://www.cnbc.com/2026/05/11/trump-ceos-elon-musk-tim-cook-larry-fink-xi-china-summit.html">attended</a> <a href="https://www.cnbc.com/2023/11/16/xi-dinner-with-us-ceos-tim-cook-elon-musk-steve-schwarzman-spotted.html">meetings</a> with Xi alongside other tech CEOs. The close relationship has put Apple in an awkward position at times. Groups like <a href="https://www.hrw.org/news/2015/09/23/silicon-valley-shouldnt-let-china-strong-arm-it-spying">Human Rights Watch warned</a> that Apple’s actions in China could put it at odds with its stated value of protecting user privacy.</p>

<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In 2014, Apple departed from tech peers like Google by choosing to store some Chinese users’ personal data on servers in mainland China, saying at the time it was meant to improve its services for those users. But the move raised significant concerns that data could be at risk and subject to government censorship, though Apple <a href="https://www.reuters.com/article/2014/08/15/us-apple-data-china-idUSKBN0GF0N720140815/">reportedly stored the encryption keys</a> outside of China. While Apple said an audit of labor conditions at its contractors found no forced labor, it also <a href="http://washingtonpost.com/technology/2020/11/20/apple-uighur/">reportedly lobbied to weaken</a> a US bill that sought to put a stronger onus on American companies to guarantee they weren’t using such a workforce. It’s submitted to Chinese regulations that required it to lower in-app purchase fees but also <a href="https://www.cjr.org/the_media_today/apple_appstore_china_censorship.php">removed apps from its app store</a> that the government objected to.</p>

<figure class="wp-block-pullquote"><blockquote><p>Cook knew how to pick his battles</p></blockquote></figure>

<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Beginning in Trump’s first term, Cook also deftly navigated the US president’s whims, and appealed to him with showy displays that cost Apple relatively little. At one memorable tour of a contractor’s Mac Pro manufacturing plant, Cook stood beside Trump as the president <a href="https://www.theverge.com/2019/11/20/20974999/trump-is-lying-about-the-new-apple-factory">falsely claimed</a> that Apple was “building plants in the United States.” (The Texas plant had manufactured Mac Pros for years, and while Apple was building something in Austin at the time, it was a new campus, not a manufacturing facility.) Cook knew how to pick his battles, balancing his relationship with Trump with maintaining confidence from staff and customers. After Trump imposed immigration restrictions on seven Muslim-majority countries in 2017, for instance, <a href="https://www.theverge.com/2017/1/28/14426560/tim-cook-trumps-executive-orders-apple">Cook told employees</a> it was “not a policy we support.”</p>

<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Trump kicked off the <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2018/07/05/business/china-us-trade-war-trump-tariffs.html">initial trade war</a> with China in his first term, leading China to impose its own tariffs on US goods in response. Eventually, Cook was able to win Apple a reprieve from some of the high tariffs imposed by the US on goods from China, such as the <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/23/technology/apple-watch-tariffs.html">Apple Watch</a>.</p>

<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In Trump’s second term, Cook’s support became more visible and his pushback more muted. Cook <a href="https://www.theverge.com/2025/1/20/24347448/tech-ceos-spotted-at-the-inauguration">attended</a> Trump’s second inauguration alongside many other tech CEOs, and <a href="https://www.theverge.com/2025/1/3/24335290/apple-donation-donald-trump-inauguration-tim-cook">donated $1 million to his inauguration committee</a>. After Cook and other CEOs attended a film screening of <a href="https://www.theverge.com/news/867429/tim-cook-andy-jassy-white-house-melania-doc">Amazon’s documentary on Melania Trump</a> hours after federal agents shot and killed protester Alex Pretti in Minneapolis, <a href="https://www.theverge.com/news/869155/apple-tim-cook-president-trump-deescalate-minneapolis">Cook assured employees</a> he was “heartbroken” by the situation and “had a good conversation with the president this week where I shared my views.” But similar to the stunt at the Texas manufacturing plant, Cook continued to present Trump with useful trophies to tout his policies — in August 2025, that came in the form of a <a href="https://www.theverge.com/news/737757/apple-president-donald-trump-ceo-tim-cook-glass-corning">gold and glass statue</a>, awarded to the president as a symbol of Apple’s “Made in the USA” efforts. And to stave off more costly tariffs, he <a href="https://www.theverge.com/news/719929/apple-100-billion-investment-us-manufacturing-trump">cut deals</a> to bring more manufacturing to the US.</p>

<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Walking that line let Cook and Apple do what they do best: pumping out a new version of the iPhone year after year, with the supply chain and trade conditions in place to make it happen. It’s only now that the AI-fueled RAM shortage is <a href="https://www.theverge.com/tech/951948/apple-tim-cook-price-increases-ram">forcing Apple’s hand to raise prices</a>, according to Cook. But even as Cook’s time as CEO has come to an end, it seems he <a href="https://www.theverge.com/policy/915422/tim-cook-apple-chairman-trump-policy">won’t soon shake his role</a> as Apple’s geopolitical negotiator-in-chief. In announcing Cook’s ascension to executive chairman, Apple wrote, Cook would continue “engaging with policymakers around the world.”</p>
						]]>
									</content>
			
					</entry>
			<entry>
			
			<author>
				<name>Lauren Feiner</name>
			</author>
			
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[If Meta&#8217;s going down, it’s taking TikTok and YouTube with it]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.theverge.com/policy/985556/meta-settlement-youtube-tiktok-snap" />
			<id>https://www.theverge.com/?p=985556</id>
			<updated>2026-08-27T10:24:29-04:00</updated>
			<published>2026-08-27T10:24:29-04:00</published>
			<category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Analysis" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Creators" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Google" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Meta" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Policy" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Report" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Snapchat" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Social Media" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Streaming" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Tech" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="TikTok" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="YouTube" />
							<summary type="html"><![CDATA[Meta might be on the hook for $17.1 billion and a host of app changes under a new kids safety settlement, but it’s already spinning the deal to its advantage. After years of being the national punching bag for social media harms, Meta has reached a settlement with 47 US states and several districts and [&#8230;]]]></summary>
			
							<content type="html">
											<![CDATA[

						
<figure>

<img alt="Graphic collage of Mark Zuckerberg." data-caption="" data-portal-copyright="Image: Cath Virginia / The Verge; Getty Images" data-has-syndication-rights="1" src="https://platform.theverge.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/chorus/uploads/chorus_asset/file/25546248/STK169_Mark_Zuckerburg_CVIRGINIA_B.jpg?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" />
	<figcaption>
		</figcaption>
</figure>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Meta might be <a href="https://www.theverge.com/policy/985032/meta-state-ag-kids-online-safety-settlement">on the hook for $17.1 billion</a> and <a href="https://www.theverge.com/tech/985329/instagram-facebook-meta-settlement-changes">a host of app changes</a> under a new kids safety settlement, but it’s already spinning the deal to its advantage.</p>

<p class="wp-block-paragraph">After years of being the national punching bag for social media harms, Meta has reached a settlement with 47 US states and several districts and territories that gives it a rare opportunity: A chance to flex on its rivals. “We want to ensure teens benefit from this new industry standard, but we cannot do it alone,” Meta says in an “<a href="https://about.fb.com/news/2026/08/open-letter-to-tiktok-and-youtube-to-join-us-in-supporting-teens/">Open Letter</a>” that is <a href="https://www.theverge.com/policy/985183/meta-is-planning-an-ad-blitz-urging-tiktok-and-youtube-to-follow-its-lead">also running as a full-page ad</a> in <em>The New York Times</em>, <em>Los Angeles Times</em>, and <em>Washington Post.</em> “These protections will only be truly effective if we work with our peers — TikTok and YouTube — to put the same measures in place.” Snap (which is also named in the agreement), TikTok, and YouTube haven’t yet made a public statement on the settlement and did not respond to requests for comment.</p>

<figure class="wp-block-pullquote"><blockquote><p>Meta has reached a settlement that gives it a rare opportunity: A chance to flex on its rivals</p></blockquote></figure>

<p class="wp-block-paragraph">By definition, settlements can only constrain the parties that sign them — in this case, Meta and the states. But this deal also names other industry players that both the AGs and Meta would seemingly like to get on board. While Meta will have to pay at least $12 billion to the signing states no matter what (so long as a court approves the deal), the rest of the money is contingent upon changes from three “Core Industry Members”:&nbsp; Snap, TikTok, and YouTube. The multibillion-dollar contingency payment will only be triggered if all three institute some of the same limits Meta’s agreed to for its apps, like daily usage limits and disabling nighttime notifications by default, and the companies that make more than $10 billion in annual profits (TikTok and YouTube) enter settlements with the states for at least as much as Meta’s $5.3 billion contingency payment, “with half of the remaining funds tied to YouTube’s payment and half tied to TikTok’s,” according to Meta.</p>

<p class="wp-block-paragraph">If TikTok and YouTube don’t make the changes and pay up, Meta gets to knock $5 billion off its settlement. (That’s not a lot of money for the company — it reported <a href="https://investor.atmeta.com/investor-news/press-release-details/2026/Meta-Reports-Second-Quarter-2026-Results/default.aspx">around $15.8 billion</a> in net revenue last quarter — but it’s not nothing.) If they do, it offsets the disadvantages Meta’s just agreed to and levels the playing field, ensuring teens won’t simply spend their two hours a day on Facebook and Instagram, then flee to YouTube and TikTok.</p>

<figure class="wp-block-pullquote"><blockquote><p>Meta gets to position itself as the platform that could soon have some of the tightest restrictions for kids in the industry, while trying to cut its rivals down to its new size</p></blockquote></figure>

<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That’s not the only benefit Meta worked in. Another provision notes that its age verification framework will incorporate “reliable age signals shared with Meta by operating systems and app stores operated by Apple and Google.” While this doesn’t diminish Meta’s own obligations, it lays helpful groundwork for Meta as it tries to solidify Apple and Google as key age verification gatekeepers, by ensuring the settlement would be compatible with laws it’s been <a href="https://www.theverge.com/2023/11/15/23962153/meta-online-age-verification-app-stores">pushing for across the country</a>.</p>

<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Through this agreement, Meta gets to position itself as the platform that could soon have some of the tightest restrictions for kids in the industry, while trying to cut its rivals down to its new size.&nbsp;</p>

<p class="wp-block-paragraph">And here’s the thing — it might actually work. Meta’s settlement will likely serve as a reference point for all future negotiations around kids online safety. It lays out what one of the biggest industry players not only thinks it can feasibly do, but also what it can live with. It also includes concrete steps for the company to take, rather than a more nebulous standard like the <a href="https://www.theverge.com/24205393/kids-online-safety-act-minors-age-verification-kosa">Kids Online Safety Act’s</a> duty of care. It’s conceivable that other platforms will make a similar calculation that these tradeoffs are worth the trouble. If they do, it won’t just be state AGs taking a victory lap, but Meta, too.</p>
						]]>
									</content>
			
					</entry>
			<entry>
			
			<author>
				<name>Lauren Feiner</name>
			</author>
			
			<title type="html"><![CDATA[Meta agrees to heavy restrictions on teen users in major lawsuit settlement]]></title>
			<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.theverge.com/policy/985032/meta-state-ag-kids-online-safety-settlement" />
			<id>https://www.theverge.com/?p=985032</id>
			<updated>2026-08-26T10:17:47-04:00</updated>
			<published>2026-08-26T09:31:32-04:00</published>
			<category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Meta" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="News" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Policy" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Privacy" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Social Media" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Speech" /><category scheme="https://www.theverge.com" term="Tech" />
							<summary type="html"><![CDATA[Meta settled its latest kids online safety trial with a group of 29 state attorneys general, sparing it from the remainder of a trial that could have cost it hundreds of billions of dollars.&#160; Under the terms of the settlement, which resolves claims by a larger group of 47 states and several districts and territories, [&#8230;]]]></summary>
			
							<content type="html">
											<![CDATA[

						
<figure>

<img alt="Photo of Mark Zuckerberg in front of the justice scale." data-caption="Mark Zuckerberg. | Image: Cath Virginia / The Verge, Getty Images" data-portal-copyright="Image: Cath Virginia / The Verge, Getty Images" data-has-syndication-rights="1" src="https://platform.theverge.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2025/04/STKS507_FTCxMETA_ANTITRUST_CVIRGINIA_2_D.jpg?quality=90&#038;strip=all&#038;crop=0,0,100,100" />
	<figcaption>
	Mark Zuckerberg. | Image: Cath Virginia / The Verge, Getty Images	</figcaption>
</figure>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Meta settled its latest kids online safety trial with a group of 29 state attorneys general, sparing it from the remainder of a trial that could have cost it hundreds of billions of dollars.&nbsp;</p>

<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Under the terms of the settlement, which resolves claims by a larger group of 47 states and several districts and territories, Meta agreed to come up with an age assurance standard that is subject to independent testing, and must have a false positive rate no higher than 10 percent for users aged 16 to 17, and 3 percent for users aged 13 to 15. The company also agreed to give teens the option to turn off personalized feeds, meaning that they won’t be shown content based on Meta’s recommendation algorithm, and Meta will suspend push notifications for teens between 10 PM and 7 AM unless parents disable those restrictions, as well as limit teens to two hours of Meta app usage per day (with exceptions for messaging and “longform content”).</p>

<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Meta will also agree to pay $17.1 billion to states over a period of 10 years. The company outlined its obligations <a href="https://about.fb.com/news/2026/08/agreement-with-state-attorneys-general-supporting-teens/">in a blog post</a>, noting that $5.3 billion of this money will only be paid out if YouTube and TikTok implement their own daily time limits and each pay an equivalent amount to that figure. </p>

<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The agreement requires Meta to try to link accounts owned by a single user to prevent circumvention of its new rules, and provide an appeals process for users. Users who say they’re over 18 but don’t complete the age assurance test within two weeks will have restrictions on their accounts meant to “restrict potential adult bad actors” from contacting teens, and be served “content recommendations inspired by Age Appropriate Experiences.” Meta will also disable push notifications during school hours for teens, unless their parents allow them. It will also implement “productive pauses” at 60 and 90 minutes of cumulative daily use of its apps, and give “a Clear and Conspicuous notice” after 15 minutes of use.&nbsp;</p>

<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The company also agreed to disable filters that simulate cosmetic procedures for teens, and likes on posts to prevent social comparison. It says it will not make false or misleading statements about the efficacy of its safety features.</p>

<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Another part of the settlement references “Age Signals from Google and Apple Operating Systems and App Stores,” and says Meta will incorporate reliable signals shared by those companies into its age assurance framework. This is something Meta has been lobbying states and Congress to force Apple and Google to do.&nbsp;</p>

<p class="wp-block-paragraph">“Our new Time Limit commitments, Night Mode features and usage limits during school hours set the right path forward for our whole industry, but this framework will only work if all our peers join us,” Meta’s chief legal officer C.J. Mahoney said in a statement. “Because teens move fluidly across dozens of apps, we need an industry-wide solution. We therefore call on our industry peers, TikTok and YouTube, to implement this new framework, right away.”</p>
						]]>
									</content>
			
					</entry>
	</feed>
